For the first 3-4 rounds yeah he has devastating power, but after that his power decreases every round.
Would you consider Prescott a big puncher??
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
His punches are very hard in the first 4 rounds. Watch Mitchell fight and most of his, he has vicious hooks.
Is Panetra considered a puncher? Yes, but he doesn't always hit the target either.
Pucnhers are guys who have very solid pucnhes that can hurt/ knock you down/out.
Punchers are often known to not be as accurate or box as smartly.
The actual finer detail of he has power but not a puncher is quite funny. The guy would be said to have a punchers chance.
Any punch can knock a man out, this is boxing, rememebr that.Comment
-
Pavlik isn;t a devastating puncher.
He is a workhorse and lands a lot and breaks people down.
The bums may get hurt, but he doesn;t stone cold knock them out.
AA can be said to have power, but not be a puncher because he holds back too much.
This is me using your logic to discredit someone who is a puncher/power.Comment
-
You are the first person to disagree with me to use logic and explain him self well...My logic on why I don't see Prescott as a puncher come me not seeing him fight but twice tho...(Maybe you seen him fight more times)So I'm not calling him a big puncher base on him KO'ing a bunch of fighters in Cuba or Columbia..Or him KO'ing Khan cause he was on the deck before that by guy's not known for their punching power...So how would I gauge Prescott's power??Pavlik isn;t a devastating puncher.
He is a workhorse and lands a lot and breaks people down.
The bums may get hurt, but he doesn;t stone cold knock them out.
AA can be said to have power, but not be a puncher because he holds back too much.
This is me using your logic to discredit someone who is a puncher/power.Comment
-
Now me and you both know Pav is a devastating puncher tho he KO'd the MW champ of the world and brutally KO'd Maranda...What has Prescott done to warrant such a name as Big Puncher or Devastating Puncher??Pavlik isn;t a devastating puncher.
He is a workhorse and lands a lot and breaks people down.
The bums may get hurt, but he doesn;t stone cold knock them out.
AA can be said to have power, but not be a puncher because he holds back too much.
This is me using your logic to discredit someone who is a puncher/power.Comment
-
Cos Prescott is not a good boxer, hes average. Thats why he loses and doesnt get bigger fights. Not because he isnt a big puncher...lol is this guy serious? I cant believe this has to be explained to a human being.The convo is not about Maidana at all you brought him up...But to answer your question he is a big puncher when his level of competition step up he still showed he had explosive power and a big punch..Ortiz was the next big thing and is still being discussed as a big threat at 140lb..Prescott on the other hand look like **** against a C level fighter..He is not a big puncher dude get it threw ya brain..Oh and prescott is not in line to fight any top fighter because he is not a big puncher,if he was they would have had him in the ring vs somebody already by now...Look at Maranda or Holt or Harris or even Bailey...Big punchers always land fights because they are dangerous why have we not seen Prescott in god knows when??Comment
-
His punches are very hard in the first 4 rounds. Watch Mitchell fight and most of his, he has vicious hooks.
Is Panetra considered a puncher? Yes, but he doesn't always hit the target either.
Pucnhers are guys who have very solid pucnhes that can hurt/ knock you down/out.
Punchers are often known to not be as accurate or box as smartly.
The actual finer detail of he has power but not a puncher is quite funny. The guy would be said to have a punchers chance.
Any punch can knock a man out, this is boxing, rememebr that.I have seen some of his fights yes, and he's not a world level puncher such as AA or Pavlik, but his punch could take out quite a few people for sure it it lands.You are the first person to disagree with me to use logic and explain him self well...My logic on why I don't see Prescott as a puncher come me not seeing him fight but twice tho...(Maybe you seen him fight more times)So I'm not calling him a big puncher base on him KO'ing a bunch of fighters in Cuba or Columbia..Or him KO'ing Khan cause he was on the deck before that by guy's not known for their punching power...So how would I gauge Prescott's power??
He remidns me abit like Holt or someone who have a hard punch but not the best boxer in the world to land a shot.
Prescott wouldn't be able to Knock out any of the top guys based on boxing, but if people stood toe to toe with him, he will have a good chance to knock them out. Similar to someone like Madiana IMO.
Vs the bums he has faced who wared with him, he created a great record.
Vs Kotelnik and Corley who can box, he didn;t look at dangerous.
Pavlik hits ahrd no doubt, but Miranda doesn;t have a great chin for me, and Taylor has been exposed himself.
I don't think that he has the type of 1 punch KO power like AA though.
He hits like a maul, while someone like Tyson hit like a shot gun.Comment
-
Maranda is a **** boxer why does he still land fights??He was just KO'd badly but I bet we will see him in the ring before Prescott..Maidana is not a good boxer yet he wins fights based on on the fact he is a big Puncher...Listen Moron if you can't express ya self don't bother posting in here you have not made a valid point yet to why Prescott is a big puncher I've giving you several reason I believe him not to be a big puncher you give me insults and act like the god of boxing Schmuck...So act like you are over the age of 8 and speak like a man speaks...Prescott is not a big puncher I bet no matter who he fights next he won't win by KO...Comment
Comment