Floyd's "vacation" basically means that he's hoping that time will slow down Manny's offense, so his defense will be more effective. That's obvious. ****m was very insightful in summarizing Floyd's view of Pacquiao's skills. ****m didn't want to say that Floyd is fearful, but Floyd's HESITATION to fight Pacquiao is based on not being able to figure out Pacquiao and that his zero losses are heavily at stake. That is a form of FEAR!!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Naazim Richardson: Era's Best is Pacquiao, Not Mayweather
Collapse
-
Originally posted by adp023 View PostFloyd's "vacation" basically means that he's hoping that time will slow down Manny's offense, so his defense will be more effective. That's obvious. ****m was very insightful in summarizing Floyd's view of Pacquiao's skills. ****m didn't want to say that Floyd is fearful, but Floyd's HESITATION to fight Pacquiao is based on not being able to figure out Pacquiao and that his zero losses are heavily at stake. That is a form of FEAR!!
Comment
-
-
I'll be respectful with my post.
I think Richardson is one of the thorough trainers in the game today. I'm a little surprised that he didn't mention how Pac camp refused to fight Mosley. But Richardson is classy and isn't going to call no one a ducker.
I agree with him when he says that if Floyd and Pac don't fight Pac will be considered the best in this era. Pac holds the P4P in my book but that doesn't mean he's going to beat Floyd.
I will continue to say Pac does extremely well when fighting boxers who like to ****. So when he fights Margo in November I expect Pac to flatten the big cheater.
But when he faces Floyd, Floyd brings a package that Pac NEVER encountered. Floyd might not be Marvin Hagler or Roberto Duran but that dude is a genius in the ring. Floyd by UD.
Comment
-
****m is right. pac takes on all challenges and puts on great fights. floyd ducks all challenges, cherrypicks, and still puts on boring fights.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tamis_Siensya View Post
I hear you, but not all pacfans don't know **** about boxing. And that also applies to the other side of the fence.
I'm just saying that everything's all said and done, the only thing left is them getting in the ring, nothing more nothing less.
I'm sure the true pacfans and Floyd fans are already outta patience and gave up on this fight, after all they've debated, argued and talked about who's gonna win and how the fight will pan out for their respective fighter. They just don't care anymore that's why you rarely see a thread nowadays of the fight breakdown coz everyone know's how Manny will win and how Floyd will win.
The other thing noted, the reason why you get all these idiotic answers outta debates and question from pacfans and floydfans is because AN IDIOTIC ANSWER IS FITTING FOR AN IDIOTIC QUESTION, and that's what's happening right now....bickering, taunting, name calling ****! No one talks boxing no more coz everyone's sick and tired of these two divas.
Now it depends on the person how to react, and as you know as of recent, it's better for the 2nd point, idiocy, for some people, rather than breaking down a fight which may never happen in the 1st place, one other thing is, if they don't know **** about boxing, then idiocy is their candy.
If you get my drift...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ray Dollars View PostAs usual Brother ****m is spot on. Mayweather has the skills and the talent, but he just doesn't want to take the risks to prove himself.
Floyd would have been down already in his career if he wasn't
a great fighter. I feel Floyd's skills keep him being in them type
of situations in the ring like Paquiao. Floyd technically is a better
fighter, but Pacquiao is just more exciting and goes all out to win
fights while Mayweather is just so technically sound that it looks
almost effortless against an opponent. I definitely like and enjoy
Manny because he comes to fight but his past fights were
promoted as challenges for him but he hasn't really challenged
himself since Juan Manuel Marquez. Both Floyd and Manny are
great fighters in their own right but Pacquiao is the more active
and exciting fighter of the 2.
Comment
-
Originally posted by dreadIknight View PostCan someone please cut and paste the part where Naazim says Pac will beat Floyd?
Thank you.Originally posted by cortdawg25 View Posthe didn't. Actually he said that he didn't really think that pacquiao could beat him. Which means if u take out the hate from naazim then he basically saying he favors floyd in a head to head fight.
Comment
-
Originally posted by GRUSTLER View PostI think Mayweather has proved he is great like Naazim said,
Floyd would have been down already in his career if he wasn't
a great fighter. I feel Floyd's skills keep him being in them type
of situations in the ring like Paquiao. Floyd technically is a better
fighter, but Pacquiao is just more exciting and goes all out to win
fights while Mayweather is just so technically sound that it looks
almost effortless against an opponent. I definitely like and enjoy
Manny because he comes to fight but his past fights were
promoted as challenges for him but he hasn't really challenged
himself since Juan Manuel Marquez. Both Floyd and Manny are
great fighters in their own right but Pacquiao is the more active
and exciting fighter of the 2.
Mannys fights usually end more stunningly so they appeal to the "car crash" mentality. Most fans only remmeber the end. If they see a vicious KO they feel they are rewarded.
Comment
Comment