Comments Thread For: Roach: I Don't Think Mayweather-Pacquiao Will Happen

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • JK1700
    Boxing Virtuoso
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Apr 2010
    • 5040
    • 394
    • 374
    • 17,974

    #21
    Originally posted by Gorilla Dogs
    floyd did duck margarito man. im a floyd fan and i recognize that lmao.

    triangle theories dont work. look at mosley lost to cotto but mosley beat margarito who in turn beat up cotto


    formula doesnt work son. styles make fights
    That's because Margarito was allowed to load his gloves against Cotto but not against Mosley. He proberbly would have beaten Shane if he hadnt been caught. But he did get caught. Cotto was a very good fighter when he beat Mosley. Unfortunetly his confidence is now shot due to the severe damage he took from Margarito. And he will never get it back.

    Comment

    • Russian Crushin
      atheist with a gun
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Dec 2009
      • 33788
      • 1,472
      • 836
      • 46,625

      #22
      [QUOTE=Jakutindi Wauya;9180462]The last time around Pacquiao refused the blood test and signed with Clottey.Mayweather never closed the door listen to what Roach himself had to say.Wasnt this the reason Mayweather fought Mosley because Pacquiao wasnt ready

      Pac was less then 2 months away from his March 13 fight date, and you expected Pac to wait for Floyd?

      People kept saying Pac should have waited for floyd back in July, and its already Sept and Floyd still has no plans to fight

      Comment

      • Russian Crushin
        atheist with a gun
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Dec 2009
        • 33788
        • 1,472
        • 836
        • 46,625

        #23
        Originally posted by JK1700
        I'm never reading anything from Roach again. This guy has become an absolute joke. He's claiming that Floyd ducked Margarito now that Pacquiao is fighting him. People need to remember that Margarito vs Mosley was to determine the best welterweight. Mosley won. Floyd fought the winner and won. Pacquiao is fighting the loser at a catchweight for a vacant belt.

        Says it all. Roach is a disgrace.
        Dude your a joke with your post.....He ducked Marg several years ago, long time before he lost to Shane

        This is one of the most ignorent comments in a while that is kind of sig worthy

        Catch up on your boxing history so next time you dont

        Comment

        • BadBrains
          Interim Champion
          Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
          • Dec 2009
          • 779
          • 22
          • 3
          • 6,879

          #24
          [QUOTE=yevskiy426;9180475]
          Originally posted by Jakutindi Wauya
          The last time around Pacquiao refused the blood test and signed with Clottey.Mayweather never closed the door listen to what Roach himself had to say.Wasnt this the reason Mayweather fought Mosley because Pacquiao wasnt ready

          Pac was less then 2 months away from his March 13 fight date, and you expected Pac to wait for Floyd?

          People kept saying Pac should have waited for floyd back in July, and its already Sept and Floyd still has no plans to fight
          I'm too tired of listening and answering these delutional mayweather fans who just knows the facts that favor floyd. If they see something against their man, well "I didn't see it!" "prove it." Damn, just go search it yourself. Ross Greenberg is now in Pac's side, **** even espn blasted floyd already!
          Last edited by BadBrains; 09-06-2010, 03:00 AM.

          Comment

          • americanbot
            Banned
            • Aug 2010
            • 4002
            • 179
            • 29
            • 4,267

            #25
            i think that pac would have actually beat cotto regardless of the damage he took against margo (even if the margo fight never even happened to cotto) i just think it's a bad style for cotto. i can remember that prime cotto barely edged mosley by 1 or 2 rounds. although cotto has always been a good tough fighter i think pac would have done good against him regardless.

            Comment

            • komandante
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Jul 2008
              • 3579
              • 184
              • 14
              • 24,294

              #26
              Agree with Freddie, Floyd Maynever fight.

              Comment

              • vercingetorix3
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Dec 2007
                • 1581
                • 73
                • 152
                • 8,356

                #27
                "Pacquiao uses PED's for disgraceful titles and catchweights, Mayweather ducks everyone and loses his marketing ability when he risks his zero and is therefore scared."

                Done. Just summarized where this thread is gonna end up. Now we can all move on and talk about the Super Six, =].

                Comment

                • JK1700
                  Boxing Virtuoso
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Apr 2010
                  • 5040
                  • 394
                  • 374
                  • 17,974

                  #28
                  Originally posted by americanbot
                  i think that pac would have actually beat cotto regardless of the damage he took against margo (even if the margo fight never even happened to cotto) i just think it's a bad style for cotto. i can remember that prime cotto barely edged mosley by 1 or 2 rounds. although cotto has always been a good tough fighter i think pac would have done good against him regardless.
                  Your saying that as if Mosley is a bad fighter. In this era he's second only to Floyd. Roach accuses Floyd of cherrypicking but isnt it ironic how you get these big fights and Floyd always fights the WINNER while Pacquiao fights the LOSER. Sometimes even at CATCHWEIGHTS.

                  Mosley-Margarito - Floyd fought the WINNER
                  Pacquiao-Marquez - Floyd fought the WINNER (we all know he won)
                  Judah-Baldomir - Floyd fought the WINNER AND the LOSER.

                  Raheem-Morales - Pacquiao fought the LOSER
                  Mayweather-Hatton - Pacquiao fought the LOSER
                  Mosley-Margarito - Pacquiao fought the LOSER

                  It's a complete myth that Pacquiao fights the best. The guy picks his fights. Floyd picks his fights too but at least he fights live opponents.
                  Last edited by JK1700; 09-06-2010, 03:15 AM.

                  Comment

                  • Russian Crushin
                    atheist with a gun
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Dec 2009
                    • 33788
                    • 1,472
                    • 836
                    • 46,625

                    #29
                    Originally posted by vercingetorix3
                    "Pacquiao uses PED's for disgraceful titles and catchweights, Mayweather ducks everyone and loses his marketing ability when he risks his zero and is therefore scared."

                    Done. Just summarized where this thread is gonna end up. Now we can all move on and talk about the Super Six, =].
                    Lol thats becoming a joke too with this whole Ward-Dirrell situation

                    Comment

                    • vercingetorix3
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Dec 2007
                      • 1581
                      • 73
                      • 152
                      • 8,356

                      #30
                      Originally posted by yevskiy426
                      Lol thats becoming a joke too with this whole Ward-Dirrell situation
                      I wouldn't jump the gun yet. If they flat out refuse to fight each other and take alternate opponents while accusing the other of ducking him or "taking power pellets", then yes I'll agree with that statement.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP