Bert Sugar "No Fighter In History Has Fought Three Straight In House Fights"

[Pullcounter]

Floyd Mayweather
1. DLH
2. HATTON
3. JMM
4. MOSLEY

Manny Pacquiao
1. COTTO
2.CLOTTEY
3. MARGO

we clearly see who is who

green k for the pwnage!

[jrosales13]

Yes, they were working together to make the fight, but neither Hatton nor Floyd were GBP fighters.

They were affilitated. Even when they were making fights with other promotional companies. GBP was right there those fighters did not need GBP if they weren't their fighters. But, they had them negotiating for them cuz they were affiliated.

Damn is not a hard concept to understand.

[PEBBLES!]

We're "******" but you're here whining and claiming Mayweather has 0 affiliation with Goldenboy?..

LMAO!..

When did I ever claim Floyd has "zero affiliation" with GBP?

Huh?

Quote my post you jackass.

Now, next time do some research before co-signing to idiocy.


Wanker

[Pullcounter]

floyd is basically a GBP fighter.

[jrosales13]

Percieved j, C'mon bruh. Gossen has been in this business for quite sometime. It was no mistake. he may was trying to woo mayweather, but Floyd was never percieved nor was he a Gossen fighter! Just like floyd is not a Goldenboy fighter. The comparison just doesn't fit. Pacquiao has a promotional agreement with a promotional company. Floyd doesn't!

You must not have been following it that closely then. Goosen sole purpose to make that fight was to have future fights with Floyd so he thought. Floyd bolted made smart business move. Goosen lost money and left high and dry.

[PEBBLES!]

They were affilitated. Even when they were making fights with other promotional companies. GBP was right there those fighters did not need GBP if they weren't their fighters. But, they had them negotiating for them cuz they were affiliated.

Damn is not a hard concept to understand.

Yes, this post is in agreement with the post you're responding to. So what's the deal?

[goldenglove2]

exactly...also if floyd was the first to fight three plus inside fights bert sugar would have made this statement about floyd during or after his last 4 fights....

so clearly "boxing historian" bert sugar knows the difference between working with a promotional company and working for a promotional company

mayweather has mayweather promotions and when he works with other promotors its like in independent label working with a major for distribution...

all fLOYDS LAST 4 fights were promoted by GBP..

PERIOD.

[Tamis!]

in house fighters aren't allowed to moonlight with other promoters....

what you're talking about is business...like may said he and dlh work well together....they're the 2 biggest cash cows so even though they don't like each other they make a lot of money together....

it is what it is...though some may not like floyd...the man works for himself...

bert sugar is right.....have a good one...

Have a good what?

I didn't say Bert was wrong, he's credible FPS, that's why I said I'm confused.

Of course he's all business (floyd with GBP), but like Jro said, Floyd had none with DiBella, Shaw, Sauerland etc. and he had with GBP was a business relationship, and who'se promotion were all of Floyd's last 4 opponents? Isn't it GBP?

So with the same premise as what Sugar said, It also applied to Floyd, coz all his last 4 we're GBP fighters.

[PEBBLES!]

floyd is basically a GBP fighter.

He works with them, but technically he is NOT a GBP fighter.


That is a fact. No point in arguing otherwise.

[cortdawg25]

They were affilitated. Even when they were making fights with other promotional companies. GBP was right there those fighters did not need GBP if they weren't their fighters. But, they had them negotiating for them cuz they were affiliated.

Damn is not a hard concept to understand.

affiliation does not mean obligated to promotionally!! hey chose GBP because Goldenboy got the results they wanted. is that so hard to understand! What so hard to get about Pacquiao signing a promotiuonal agreement and floyd hasn't as of yet.