Bert Sugar "No Fighter In History Has Fought Three Straight In House Fights"

[jrosales13]

That is not true because he is not a Goldenboy fighter. According to your logic, Floyd was a goosen fighter when he fought Baldomir! That isn't true just like Floyd being a goldenboy fighter isn't true!

Actually the whole purpose of Goosen making that fight was the purpose to have Floyd as a Goosen fighter. That is why they work together and was suppose to have future business together. However, Goosen made the sole mistake in not having it under contract. Lost money in the Baldomir fight and Floyd bolted to GBP and left Goosen high and dry.

So yea at that time he was perceived as a Goosen fighter

[ronniejunior]

Didn't Floyd employ GBP to promote his fights since DLH up to Mosley?

Isn't that an In-house thing to begin with?

Me confused...

in house fighters aren't allowed to moonlight with other promoters....

what you're talking about is business...like may said he and dlh work well together....they're the 2 biggest cash cows so even though they don't like each other they make a lot of money together....

it is what it is...though some may not like floyd...the man works for himself...

bert sugar is right.....have a good one...

[jrosales13]

Hatton was not a GBP fighter when Floyd fought him.

So according to your train of thought Floyd didn't fight an in-house fight.

Hatton at that time was affilitated with GBP. He had already left Warren.

[jrosales13]

in house fighters aren't allowed to moonlight with other promoters....

what you're talking about is business...like may said he and dlh work well together....they're the 2 biggest cash cows so even though they don't like each other they make a lot of money together....

it is what it is...though some may not like floyd...the man works for himself...

bert sugar is right.....have a good one...

Cotto was moonlighting with Oscar so I guess Pac-Cotto fight?

[PEBBLES!]

Hatton at that time was affilitated with GBP. He had already left Warren.

Yes, they were working together to make the fight, but neither Hatton nor Floyd were GBP fighters.

[jrosales13]

J you know the biz...No need to go round and round about it.

........True

[Bhopreign]

So yea at that time he was perceived as a Goosen fighter

Thats laughable man and you know it. There are some knowledgeable people around here who've been following the sport for some time and you cant just say anything and think people are going to believe it. Floyd has his own promotional company that he promotes his fights with end of, co-promotional en****** does not fall under the umbrella of belonging to that company. Floyd is not a Golden Boy fighter.

[PEBBLES!]

Bert Sugar makes some really outrageous comments sometimes.


TS, do you have a link to this interview???

[ronniejunior]

Cotto was moonlighting with Oscar so I guess Pac-Cotto fight?

bert sugar is right...

[cortdawg25]

Actually the whole purpose of Goosen making that fight was the purpose to have Floyd as a Goosen fighter. That is why they work together and was suppose to have future business together. However, Goosen made the sole mistake in not having it under contract. Lost money in the Baldomir fight and Floyd bolted to GBP and left Goosen high and dry.

So yea at that time he was perceived as a Goosen fighter

Percieved j, C'mon bruh. Gossen has been in this business for quite sometime. It was no mistake. he may was trying to woo mayweather, but Floyd was never percieved nor was he a Gossen fighter! Just like floyd is not a Goldenboy fighter. The comparison just doesn't fit. Pacquiao has a promotional agreement with a promotional company. Floyd doesn't!