How Did Judge Jack Blackburn Give The 11th To Pascal?

[Medved]

i guess i am bias becuase i had devon winning another close fight by a couple rds. kotelnik just wasn't busy enough for me and just covered up when devon was punching. pascal on the other hand was darting in and out. he showed some movement...some ring generalship imo. i do believe pascal won.. i just don't think it was 108-101 or 106- 103.

He was throwing air punches that hit the air or the gloves, he didnt land ****, I guess its better to waste your energy and pretend your landing punches rather than landing clean shots.

I agree it was a close fight but look at how that fight was judged, look at lederman's card before bringing up corruption for one round in a fight when the whole fight was judged wrong two weeks ago. Could the judge gave it to Pascal? Sure maybe he was confused about how to judge it because he never had this situation before or he made an honest mistake. To call a country corrupt for 1 contraversial round that made no diffirence is crazy when there have been fights in USA where people clearly got robbed during the WHOLE fight and not just one round. If that round made any diffirence to the fight I would have a problem but you guys are making a problem out of nothing. Like judges in america never get a round wrong? There was also a showtime event couple weeks ago out of MN where some local judge had a crazy score card that everyone laughed at.

[Bhopreign]

He was throwing air punches that hit the air or the gloves, he didnt land ****, I guess its better to waste your energy and pretend your landing punches rather than landing clean shots.

I agree it was a close fight but look at how that fight was judged, look at lederman's card before bringing up corruption for one round in a fight when the whole fight was judged wrong two weeks ago. Could the judge gave it to Pascal? Sure maybe he was confused about how to judge it because he never had this situation before or he made an honest mistake. To call a country corrupt for 1 contraversial round that made no diffirence is crazy when there have been fights in USA where people clearly got robbed during the WHOLE fight and not just one round. If that round made any diffirence to the fight I would have a problem but you guys are making a problem out of nothing. Like judges in america never get a round wrong? There was also a showtime event couple weeks ago out of MN where some local judge had a crazy score card that everyone laughed at.

Never had the situation before? Who are you trying to fool? Even if it never happened for him, which it has before, he still picked a side and by his choice said Pascal was better in that round. Why try and take up for a corrupt judge.

[Bhopreign]

Yea he looks corrupt to me.

[cortdawg25]

He was throwing air punches that hit the air or the gloves, he didnt land ****, I guess its better to waste your energy and pretend your landing punches rather than landing clean shots.

I agree it was a close fight but look at how that fight was judged, look at lederman's card before bringing up corruption for one round in a fight when the whole fight was judged wrong two weeks ago. Could the judge gave it to Pascal? Sure maybe he was confused about how to judge it because he never had this situation before or he made an honest mistake. To call a country corrupt for 1 contraversial round that made no diffirence is crazy when there have been fights in USA where people clearly got robbed during the WHOLE fight and not just one round. If that round made any diffirence to the fight I would have a problem but you guys are making a problem out of nothing. Like judges in america never get a round wrong? There was also a showtime event couple weeks ago out of MN where some local judge had a crazy score card that everyone laughed at.

but lederman is just another commentator...what he say don't really mean nothing. this ain't the 1st time that i disagreed with lederman's card....

but i don't think the TS started stated a whole country was corrupt. i think he said woodburn was corrupt and was calling him out for it. i think u angry about somethign else that is not even in this thread.

[Heru]

From my perspective, 1 judge is always paid off in fights abroad, in this case it's Blackburn. They're there to make the most lopsided fights for a visitor into a MD or SD.

[Yessum]

Sorry I meant the score from the 11th round specifically

figured if woodburn had the score 108/101 for pascal he may have given pascal the 11th.http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?hum...0691&cat=boxer

[deanrw]

Well he was either on crack or highly influenced by the crowd. The 11th round was Dawson's for sure.

As for the 3 point spread judges, they were right on the money. That is why they pick two judges from different locales in international fights, to prevent home influence. The influence may have been still there according to the one judge, but the other two made it right.

[The_Demon]

Not sure what the judge was smoking but Dawson lost,get over it ffs!

[daggum]

these guys can't even cheat properly that's what makes me mad. if you want to see world class cheating check out sven ottke's boxrec resume. almost every single fight is a SD or MD like 114-113 114-113 113-114. now those guys are good! giving every single round to your hometown guy is so obvious. learn from the best please.