How Did Judge Jack Blackburn Give The 11th To Pascal?

[Franco2012]

He didnt want to give round to Dawson cuz Dawson found the way outta the fight with that illegal headbutt!

[Yessum]

Whatever, anyone who knows boxing knows Dawson lost most of the rounds, and lost the fight in addition.

i think its important to point this judge out. i was a pascal fan in this one
and no way he got the 11th. even understood why some made it a 10-8 for dawson.

box re-c doesnt list judge jack blackburn. he canadian?

[Bhopreign]

Doesnt matter if Pascal won more rounds, him giving the 11th to Pascal either shows he is corrupt or doesnt know how to judge a fight. And people wonder why nobody watches this sport. Since he gave the 11th to Pascal that means no matter what Chad did he was going to lose in Blackburn's book.

[Bhopreign]

i think its important to point this judge out. i was a pascal fan in this one
and no way he got the 11th. even understood why some made it a 10-8 for dawson.

box re-c doesnt list judge jack blackburn. he canadian?

Its Woodburn, sorry and yes he is Canadian.

[street bully]

Doesnt matter if Pascal won more rounds, him giving the 11th to Pascal either shows he is corrupt or doesnt know how to judge a fight. And people wonder why nobody watches this sport. Since he gave the 11th to Pascal that means no matter what Chad did he was going to lose in Blackburn's book.

Is Blackburn the one who has it 108-101? The other two had the correct score of 106-103.

[Bhopreign]

Is Blackburn the one who has it 108-101? The other two had the correct score of 106-103.

Sorry its Woodburn and yes he had it 108-101, he's Canadian also which now makes all the sense in the world.

[Medved]

Doesnt matter if Pascal won more rounds, him giving the 11th to Pascal either shows he is corrupt or doesnt know how to judge a fight. And people wonder why nobody watches this sport. Since he gave the 11th to Pascal that means no matter what Chad did he was going to lose in Blackburn's book.

on ALL the score cards it didnt matter what Chad did he still wouldve lost! Only a KO wouldve won him the fight so it doesnt matter, theres 2 other judges in there not just him. You guys need to stop making petty excuses for Dawson. You guys mad 3 Americans get owned in 3 weeks? So now just need to make million excuses instead of giving Pascal his props? Dawson fought a **** fight and only woke up in the 11th round when it was too late, pascal wasnt even close to being knocked out and he was just playing possum to tire out Dawson. Look at their records, Dawson cant knockout 40 year olds and Pascal hasnt been KO'd. So keep making excuses for the dumb Dawson. I know he aint too bright but stop the ****ing excuses.

[Megamasterking]

Was the fix in no matter what Chad did on Saturday? Was this not Chad's best round? Remember this is the round that Chad started the round off bouncing Pascal's head back and forth like a pinball against the ropes and in mid round caught Pascal with a counter uppercut that stopped Pascal like he had seen a ghost, this is so sad.

Only reason i see is that he was closer to the ring than all of us and saw Pascal looking at his corner and showed them that Dawson wasn't hurting him with those fast but weak shots. In an amateur fight, fast shots win no power can make you win but in a pro fight it's different take a look at this:

53. The three (3) judges shall be seated on opposite sides of the ring, adjacent to the ring apron. They shall be seated alone with no person in close proximity. The judges shall watch every phase of the contest and make a decision if the contest lasts the limit of rounds scheduled. The decision of the judges shall be based primarily on effectiveness, taking into account the following points:

(a) a clean, forceful hit landed on any vulnerable part of the body above the belt should be credited in proportion to its damaging effect;

(b) aggressiveness is next in importance and points should be awarded to the boxer who sustains the attack of a round by the greatest number of skilful attacks;

(c) defensive work is relatively important and points should be given for cleverly avoiding or blocking a blow;

(d) points should be awarded where ring generalship is con****uous. This comprises such points as the ability to quickly grasp and take advantage of every opportunity offered; the capacity to cope with all kinds of situations which may arise; to foresee and neutralize an opponent's method of attack; or to force an opponent to adopt a style of boxing at which he is not particularly skilful;

(e) it is advisable to deduct points when a boxer persistently delays the action of a contest by clinching and by lack of aggressiveness;
(f) points should be deducted for a foul even though it is unintentional and not serious enough to warrant disqualification; and

(g) a boxer should be given credit for sportsmanlike actions in the ring and for close adherence to the spirit as well as the letter of the Rules, and for refraining from taking technical advantage of situations unfair to an opponent.

Knowing this can change some views...

[Gorilla Dogs]

why you keep complaining about this fight son. ur boi clearly lost. cry in a pillow, and move on. life goes on son


Chad Dawson isnt the centre of the universe big f'n DEAL!

[Bhopreign]

Only reason i see is that he was closer to the ring than all of us and saw Pascal looking at his corner and showed them that Dawson wasn't hurting him with those fast but weak shots. In an amateur fight, fast shots win no power can make you win but in a pro fight it's different take a look at this:

53. The three (3) judges shall be seated on opposite sides of the ring, adjacent to the ring apron. They shall be seated alone with no person in close proximity. The judges shall watch every phase of the contest and make a decision if the contest lasts the limit of rounds scheduled. The decision of the judges shall be based primarily on effectiveness, taking into account the following points:

(a) a clean, forceful hit landed on any vulnerable part of the body above the belt should be credited in proportion to its damaging effect;

(b) aggressiveness is next in importance and points should be awarded to the boxer who sustains the attack of a round by the greatest number of skilful attacks;

(c) defensive work is relatively important and points should be given for cleverly avoiding or blocking a blow;

(d) points should be awarded where ring generalship is con****uous. This comprises such points as the ability to quickly grasp and take advantage of every opportunity offered; the capacity to cope with all kinds of situations which may arise; to foresee and neutralize an opponent's method of attack; or to force an opponent to adopt a style of boxing at which he is not particularly skilful;

(e) it is advisable to deduct points when a boxer persistently delays the action of a contest by clinching and by lack of aggressiveness;
(f) points should be deducted for a foul even though it is unintentional and not serious enough to warrant disqualification; and

(g) a boxer should be given credit for sportsmanlike actions in the ring and for close adherence to the spirit as well as the letter of the Rules, and for refraining from taking technical advantage of situations unfair to an opponent.

Knowing this can change some views...

No it cant change a thing, if it could the other two judges would have gave Pascal the 11th also, they didnt. All you need is partial vision in one eye to see in no way shape or form did Pascal win the 11th round. Youve been bias all weekend and perhaps longer to your countryman, its really not a good look.