Your scorecard for Dawson-Pascal

[TriggerItch]

.....CD-JP......
rd1:10-9
rd2:9-10
rd3:9-10
rd4:9-10
rd5:10-9 this was close, could go either way
rd6:10-9
rd7:10-9 besides that flashy punch that people thought hurt dawson(which i think didn't) and the crazy flurry that missed just about everypunch, i gave it to chad
rd8:9-10 it was dawson all through the round till pascal nearly took him out and since the purpose of the game is damage, pascal takes it
rd9:9-10 close round, both fighters hurt, chad probabley landed more, but pascal did more damage
rd10:10-9 besides a late rally which consisted of 5 bodyshots, a low blow and a rabbit punch, dawson clearly
rd11:10-9 dawson without a doubt, pascal hurt 3 times, ready to go down, could've been an 10-8 round, we'll never know


post yours

[treize]

.....CD-JP......
rd1:10-9
rd2:9-10
rd3:9-10
rd4:9-10
rd5:10-9 this was close, could go either way
rd6:10-9
rd7:10-9 besides that flashy punch that people thought hurt dawson(which i think didn't) and the crazy flurry that missed just about everypunch, i gave it to chad
rd8:9-10 it was dawson all through the round till pascal nearly took him out and since the purpose of the game is damage, pascal takes it
rd9:9-10 close round, both fighters hurt, chad probabley landed more, but pascal did more damage
rd10:10-9 besides a late rally which consisted of 5 bodyshots, a low blow and a rabbit punch, dawson clearly
rd11:10-9 dawson without a doubt, pascal hurt 3 times, ready to go down, could've been an 10-8 round, we'll never know


post yours

1. Pascal
2. Pascal
3. Pascal
4. Dawson
5. Pascal
6. Dawson
7. Pascal
8. Pascal
9. Pascal
10. Pascal
11. Dawson till stoppage

[TriggerItch]

good of you to troll on your alt

[treize]

Maybe I got it wrong but there seem to be 'a few' others who see it the same way I do...

[ChampBox@PR]

1. Pascal
2. Pascal
3. Pascal
4. Dawson
5. Pascal
6. Dawson
7. Pascal
8. Pascal
9. Pascal
10. Pascal
11. Dawson till stoppage

This is exactly how the fight went. Having the fight close means you dont know how to score a fight.

good job homie, green K

[Marduke]

Dawson was losing, no question in my mind.

I don't think he lost because anything Pascal did, he lost because he just wouldn't throw punches, put punches together, and just take control of the fight.

[Crazylegs77]

I gave Dawson 4 rounds if I remember correctly.

[treize]

Dawson was losing, no question in my mind.

I don't think he lost because anything Pascal did, he lost because he just wouldn't throw punches, put punches together, and just take control of the fight.

100% agree...

And he didn't follow up everytime he could've, and stopped putting pressure on P.
Didn't understand it at all.

I'd rather say that D. lost than P. won the fight.

Maybe he underestimated P's speed, pop and unorthodox way of 'jumpin' on him' and was scared to follow. Just an impression that I jhad...

[MACAQUEINBLACK]

Mine's quite different from most that I've seen. Here it is with no explanation of how I scored the rounds - this is after watching the video-file to score it last night, watching live I had it wider for Pascal.


1. 10-9 Dawson
2. 10-9 Pascal
3. 10-9 Pascal
4. 10-9 Dawson
5. 10-9 Pascal
6. 10-9 Dawson
7. 10-9 Dawson
8. 10-9 Pascal
9. 10-9 Pascal
10. 10-9 Pascal
11. 10-9 Dawson


105-104 Pascal

[Bushbaby]

This is exactly how the fight went. Having the fight close means you dont know how to score a fight.

good job homie, green K

One thing for sure,the fight was competitive,a fight can be close but still have a wide ud!!Dawson was losing most of the rounds,but he was competitive & it clearly showed late in the fight!!