Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

in boxing nothin is worse then noneffective agressiveness

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by marvdave
    effective aggressiveness
    ring generalship
    harder/cleaner shots

    these are the criteria for scoring bouts...seems some judges forgot that last weekend.
    so dave, you scored it a win for hopkins?

    Comment


    • #22
      The funny thing is Lederman preaches those three rules all the time but always scores aggressiveness even though it's not very effective.

      Comment


      • #23
        Give the names of the fighter that are aggresive but effective.

        1) Pacquiao
        2) Morales
        3) Juan Manuel Marquez
















        forget about no. 3 instead put Barrera in there.

        Comment


        • #24
          Im not a huge fan of Hopkins but I think he could dominate Taylor whenever & however he wishes & I think his lost was due to his overconfidence. The only boxer that I think would give him problems is Winky Wright and if they ever fight, i will bet a huge amt. on Wright.

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by tracylee
            so dave, you scored it a win for hopkins?
            actually Tracy, I haven't seen it yet. I was more referring to the media guys I've spoken to who were ringside. That seemed to be the overwhelming opinion ringside. I will see it this weekend and give my personal thoughts after that.

            I should have worded that post better

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by marvdave
              actually Tracy, I haven't seen it yet. I was more referring to the media guys I've spoken to who were ringside. That seemed to be the overwhelming opinion ringside. I will see it this weekend and give my personal thoughts after that.

              I should have worded that post better
              as usual, I look forward to reading your input, since youre a boxing freak and actually know what the hell youre talking about (ummhhhh, most of the time anyway )

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by tracylee
                as usual, I look forward to reading your input, since youre a boxing freak and actually know what the hell youre talking about (ummhhhh, most of the time anyway )
                who you calling a freak?

                I can't wait to see it. My interest has peaked. I've heard comments ranging from Taylor won easy to Hopkins won 9 rounds.

                can't wait

                thanks

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by marvdave
                  who you calling a freak?

                  I can't wait to see it. My interest has peaked. I've heard comments ranging from Taylor won easy to Hopkins won 9 rounds.

                  can't wait

                  thanks
                  Lol, YOU, have no doubt about it, FREAK!

                  Actually, I could live with a draw but gave it to taylor by 2....not a whole hell of alot but enough to win it (in my opinion anyway)..but it was not what I'd call 'easy' for either guy, and Nard winning 9 is stretching it so far it breaks! Nard simply didnt do enough for far too long..you know the story by now I'm sure.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X
                  TOP