Jeff Lacy and Jermain Taylor

[scap]

becuase the whole world know he lost the fight

1) The whole world does not believe he lost the fight...are you exagerating RED...yes you are...

2) So what if he lost the fight, at the very very least it was a very close decision and for most of the fight the young kid had Nards repspect, Taylor had never fought anyone in NArds league and he had some moments and he will be tougher to beat because of this fight. How the **** can anyones opinion of Taylor go down?

Ill tell you what if he did have a concussion than only Taylor knows how bad that affected him and if he thinks or knows he was ****ed up late in the fight because of the concussion his confidence will be sky high heading into a rematch.

Think about it for a second, the concussion is something that is a mystery...how much did it affect him-he got the W, would he have continue to control the fight at his pace had it not of happened? Who knows....Taylor knows and the outcome of the rematch will hinge upon many things and the concussion factor will be a significant one that many wont even talk about.

[Run]

becuase the whole world know he lost the fight

Yeah I agree. Only people hugging Taylor's nuts would pick the fight for him.



Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!

[tracylee]

Boy we have some idiots on this board. 9 people picking Lacy by KO. It figures why so many idiots on this board thinks Hopkins won.

So it seems
I not only had Taylor winning the hopkins fight, for obvious reasons, but think he'd pull off a win against Lacy too. As much as I like Lacy, he's not been as strong with the finish in his last few fights and I think that Taylors jab, in his face ALL NIGHT LONG, would definately present some problems for lacy. If lacy got frustrated about it (as I've seen him do in the past) and goes to headhunting, it's a a bad night for him.
Both guys have loads of talent and have their separate 'speacilities', but that jab of taylors would have to be neutralized or lacy accomplishes very little.

[tracylee]

Yeah I agree. Only people hugging Taylor's nuts would pick the fight for him.

NO NO NO, thats bull****!PIcking a winner based on what the two guys have to offer is NOT nuthugging. I hate that word cause its lame and too easy. People can genuinely think a certain way about a fights possible outcome without it being nuthugging. Peeps are too fast to use that term when it doesnt apply.

[guru]

i think style wise taylor matches up well with lacy...

[Run]

NO NO NO, thats bull****!PIcking a winner based on what the two guys have to offer is NOT nuthugging. I hate that word cause its lame and too easy. People can genuinely think a certain way about a fights possible outcome without it being nuthugging. Peeps are too fast to use that term when it doesnt apply.

Nuthugging is applied directly to scoring fights. You fixate yourself on the fighter of preference (being taylor) and close your eyes/refuse to accept the fact Hopkins was leading on the score cards. Influenced directly from having seen Hopkins wobbled: which means he lost the fight.

Kind of like the people who thought Corley beat Cotto even though he got knocked out. Its pathetic.

Corley lands a lucky punch on Cotto and stuns him........everyone on the board was crying fix, because Corley lost the fight. Its a mild form of ******ation.



Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!

[tracylee]

Nuthugging is applied directly to scoring fights. You fixate yourself on the fighter of preference (being taylor) and close your eyes/refuse to accept the fact Hopkins was leading on the score cards. Influenced directly from having seen Hopkins wobbled: which means he lost the fight.

Kind of like the people who thought Corley beat Cotto even though he got knocked out. Its pathetic.

Corley lands a lucky punch on Cotto and stuns him........everyone on the board was crying fix, because Corley lost the fight. Its a mild form of ******ation.

Strange, I wasnt fixated on a thing, and still had taylor winning by 2 pts. I'm not a taylor nuthugger..that is simply the way I scored it using the 10 pt must system. Had nothing to do with anybodys nuts! It was all about math really.

[scap]

Nuthugging is applied directly to scoring fights. You fixate yourself on the fighter of preference (being taylor) and close your eyes/refuse to accept the fact Hopkins was leading on the score cards. Influenced directly from having seen Hopkins wobbled: which means he lost the fight.

Kind of like the people who thought Corley beat Cotto even though he got knocked out. Its pathetic.

Corley lands a lucky punch on Cotto and stuns him........everyone on the board was crying fix, because Corley lost the fight. Its a mild form of ******ation.

Im sure you wnet into the fight with a completely open mind...

You are comparing Taylor/Hopkins to Corley/Cotto...explain to me how this makes sense....after you have explained yourself I will then tell you why your wrong...

I await your reply, love Scap.

[tino]

frankly , lacy was marketed as a small tyson , but he looked ordinary to me in his first fights .

he has among the heavyest hands pound4pound , but the step up in opposition showed he doesnt have that much one punch KO power .
he showed better skills when he realized that his power wasnt that great , and he is a good fighter now , BUT taylor long jab and better all around skills will lead to a decision for taylor .

[Run]

You are comparing Taylor/Hopkins to Corley/Cotto...explain to me how this makes sense....

People who hate puerto-rican fighters wanted Cotto to lose so bad...they went to an imaginary place where Corley won the fight.

People who hate Bernard Hopkins, used a 2x4 to ram Taylor's nutscack down their esophagus.



Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!