Can Dawson be the next Jacobs ?
Collapse
-
-
Wait hes NOT a complete fighter? Hes as close to a complete fighter as i have seen in a while.He's beatable contrary to what his hardcore fans will have you believe on here. If you pay attention to his style he doesn't land any effective punches hardly. I think Tarver had close to the same percentage of punches landed in both fights against him because Tarver was catching a lot of punches on his gloves. In fact somebody made a thread about it and showed a gif of Dawson throwing a five punch combination that didn't even hit the mark once on Tarver.
His right hand is weak. His uppercut with either hand is so so. I'm just saying he's not this complete fighter that you guys make him out to be.
He beat Tarver pretty easily twice and there is no reason to disect small mistakes he made in slowmoComment
-
Well it was a close fight but regardless it wouldn't be a big knock on Dawson. If Dawson were to lose to Pascal it just means none of these guys have truly pulled away from the cluster *** that is Ward, Dirrell, Dawson, Bute, Pascal, Froch, Kessler etc etc. With that said I don't think Dawson will lose and I believe this win will pretty much show that he is a bit better than the rest of the pack.Comment
-
Not comparing? The title of your thread if "Can Dawson Be The Next Jacobs" but your not comparing, then you are so quick to reply to other people comments just with anything you can think of and it is just not making any senseComment
-
I'm not saying the guy is not good, but the way people talk about him on here you would think he's the next Jesus Christ. They said he's the best fighter outside of Pacquiao and Mayweather.Comment
-
YOur being ****** by listening to people joke around and making a ****** thread like this
Plus how was the jacobs fight a joke exactly?Comment
-
Skill wise he is one of the best. He is about to clean out the division and has skills as good as anyoneComment
-
exactly, seems like todays boxing fans only point out the stuff they want to see
basically they would say "lets forget about Dawson's overall dominating performance against Adamek and only focus on the knock down" then some how they parlay that into "Dawson has a weak chin because Adamek dropped in late in that fight" despite the fact that he got right back up and still won the fight
Comment
-
Yea I see that alot. Dawson is a very good fighter but has no following, not the biggest personality and doesnt really get into any fan friendly wars, but hes great nonethelessexactly, seems like todays boxing fans only point out the stuff they want to see
basically they would say "lets forget about Dawson's overall dominating performance against Adamek and only focus on the knock down" then some how they parlay that into "Dawson has a weak chin because Adamek dropped in late in that fight" despite the fact that he got right back up and still won the fight :nonono:Comment
-
Not comparing their career cause i know that Dawson is WC and the other is not, maybe i'm not clear with my English cause i speak French, this is the only place where i use some English. When i see some people putting Pirog in the TOP 10 P4P or very close to it, i'm asking myself will these people have the same logic when it comes to Dawson. If someone beat Dawson where do you rank him ?Comment
Comment