Can Dawson be the next Jacobs ?

[Megamasterking]

Dawson=proven champ,true story,I'm still trying to understand this comparison!!

It's not a comparison, my point was to prove that Dawson is for real and Jacobs an untested boxer fighting for a title ! Everybody agree with my point but they just don't realize it !

[Megamasterking]

who in the **** ever said Dawson was a future ATG??? please find me on post on this board from anyone that was said that Dawson was a future ATG

your comparing a young veteran that has been tested to basically a young prospect that wasn't tested and LOST his first big test as a fighter, that is why you can't compare, Jacobs was trying to get were Dawson is already at, you clearly don't watch much boxing, your comments along is poof if that

Im not comparing, in fact you agree to my point, one is a true WC and the other was fighting for a title but was a kid with boxing gloves on.

[Russian Crushin]

Jacobs was suppose to beat Pirog according to WHO ? are you serious ? if you have bet some real money on that fight you know according to WHO. Pascal as no chance against Dawson, if Dawson is that good. Where i come from as nothing to do with it, if Jacobs was an unknown untested prospect why was he in the wbo # 1 spot and why did he got a chance to fight for the vacant WBO title . I think he was close to be a WC closer then all the "prospects".

HAHAHA what does that even mean

[Junito-Rulez]

Dawson is already a star and a legit champ TS. No matter which Dawson you're talking about. What you said is like : Can Wladimir Klitschko be the next Povetkin?

[Iceta Lives]

He's beatable contrary to what his hardcore fans will have you believe on here. If you pay attention to his style he doesn't land any effective punches hardly. I think Tarver had close to the same percentage of punches landed in both fights against him because Tarver was catching a lot of punches on his gloves. In fact somebody made a thread about it and showed a gif of Dawson throwing a five punch combination that didn't even hit the mark once on Tarver.

His right hand is weak. His uppercut with either hand is so so. I'm just saying he's not this complete fighter that you guys make him out to be.

[Russian Crushin]

It's not a comparison, my point was to prove that Dawson is for real and Jacobs an untested boxer fighting for a title ! Everybody agree with my point but they just don't realize it !

Im not comparing, in fact you agree to my point, one is a true WC and the other was fighting for a title but was a kid with boxing gloves on.

Dude i dont really understand these qoutes at all but i will give it my best.

Jacobs was not completely untest, he just hasnt fought a top guy at 160 probably because they have belts and are champs. He fought for a title because he was the #1 ranked guy for the WBO belt, THATS why.

Now it seems like your bashing on Jacobs for being a "kid" with Gloves, Saying he was untested. He was no bum

[Megamasterking]

HAHAHA what does that even mean

It means that the Jacobs fight was a joke and now many "don't ask me how many" people think that Pirog is one of best boxer, some even put him in the top 10 P4P ! HAaaaaaHaaa

[Check]

Dawson is already prove so if he were to lose it would just be because he lost, he would still be considered good. I assume from your location you might be a Pascal or Bute fan and might be predicting them to beat Dawson but if they did it would just mean Dawson lost to a really good fighter.

[jrosales13]

IMO Dawson is for real but Jacobs was on many list has a future star and he lost his first real test.

I don't want to compare their career, Dawson is WC and Jacobs a Prospect. Again, Dawson is a REAL WC and Jacobs was an untested kid fighting for a title.

Will you see Dawson as a "Jacobs" if he lose to a average fighter or will still see him as one of the best P4P. i hope im clear...

Is it safe to say that Dawson has beaten guys that are above average?

Is it safe to say that Dawson has beaten top guys of his weight-class?

So again how can he be the next Jacobs?

[Iceta Lives]

Dawson is already prove so if he were to lose it would just be because he lost, he would still be considered good. I assume from your location you might be a Pascal or Bute fan and might be predicting them to beat Dawson but if they did it would just mean Dawson lost to a really good fighter.

One who couldn't beat Froch? Props for Dawson going into the lion's den though.