Today's Manny Pacquiao is the MOST SKILLED Southpaw ever

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ErikTheGreat
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Mar 2010
    • 288
    • 18
    • 0
    • 6,360

    #21
    Originally posted by Championart
    You guys sure do a good job at giving *******s a bad name smh.

    In forum like this, nothing is taken seriously. *****s and the *******s are just having fun.

    Comment

    • The Comedian
      Banned
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Apr 2010
      • 2277
      • 149
      • 2
      • 2,567

      #22
      Originally posted by baracuda
      who then ?...vic darchinyan?...lol

      Comment

      • Scott9945
        Gonna be more su****ious
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Mar 2007
        • 22032
        • 741
        • 1,371
        • 30,075

        #23
        Originally posted by baracuda
        tell that to bert sugar!...lol


        This is the same clown who says that 6'0 200 lb contenders from the 1970's would beat Wladimir Klitschko.

        Comment

        • FeFist
          No.1
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jun 2008
          • 9251
          • 576
          • 357
          • 29,695

          #24
          Originally posted by baracuda
          tell that to bert sugar!...lol

          I don't give a **** what Bert Sugar thinks. You see I actually watch boxing so I don't have to rely on the words of ''credible historians''.

          Comment

          • Championart
            Interim Champion
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • Oct 2009
            • 834
            • 43
            • 1
            • 7,251

            #25
            Originally posted by baracuda
            it was'nt us pacfans who first said pac is the greaest southpaw ever , it came from a respected boxing historian who knows more than all of us combined in nsb!
            Speak for yourself, you have no idea who posts on nsb. Furthermore boxing historian's are human beings themselves thus capable of their own bias. If a boxing historian said that Pac is the most skilled southpaw ever that should tell you all there is to know about said historian. Pac is a great fighter but most skilled southpaw of all time he is definitely not.

            Comment

            • baracuda
              Banned
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Mar 2009
              • 10779
              • 259
              • 569
              • 11,470

              #26
              Originally posted by The Comedian
              what's the purpose of this video?......

              Comment

              • baracuda
                Banned
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Mar 2009
                • 10779
                • 259
                • 569
                • 11,470

                #27
                Originally posted by Scott9945
                This is the same clown who says that 6'0 200 lb contenders from the 1970's would beat Wladimir Klitschko.
                was he wrong?........lol

                Comment

                • baracuda
                  Banned
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Mar 2009
                  • 10779
                  • 259
                  • 569
                  • 11,470

                  #28
                  Originally posted by Championart
                  Speak for yourself, you have no idea who posts on nsb. Furthermore boxing historian's are human beings themselves thus capable of their own bias. If a boxing historian said that Pac is the most skilled southpaw ever that should tell you all there is to know about said historian. Pac is a great fighter but most skilled southpaw of all time he is definitely not.
                  LOL....who posts in nsb more credible than bert sugar?...you?.....lol

                  Comment

                  • baracuda
                    Banned
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 10779
                    • 259
                    • 569
                    • 11,470

                    #29
                    Originally posted by FeFist
                    I don't give a **** what Bert Sugar thinks. You see I actually watch boxing so I don't have to rely on the words of ''credible historians''.
                    who gives a damn about what you think ?....bert sugar>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>you!

                    Comment

                    • Scott9945
                      Gonna be more su****ious
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Mar 2007
                      • 22032
                      • 741
                      • 1,371
                      • 30,075

                      #30
                      Originally posted by baracuda
                      was he wrong?........lol
                      If you saw them (Quarry and Shavers) in the same ring as Wladimir, you'd quicky realize you were about to see a gross mismatch.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP