Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Thomas Hauser: The Mayweather-Pacquiao Negotiations

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by Blooper View Post
    on one thread he says there were none.

    on another he says he had "inside sources" confirming there were.

    he can't seem to make up his fckin mind.
    Yea.. Some of these dudes on here ain't boxing fans.. transparent as hell.

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by T.I. View Post
      Yea.. Some of these dudes on here ain't boxing fans.. transparent as hell.


      i think its funny how Haymon and Greenburg thought they could get Floyd to agree after looking over Arum's proposal...the only reason why Greenburg and Haymon haven't said **** is because it would make Floyd look like an even bigger *****...if they embarrass floyd, floyd has another reason not to fight


      the last sentence sums everything up

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by Makavelli View Post
        i think its funny how Haymon and Greenburg thought they could get Floyd to agree after looking over Arum's proposal...the only reason why Greenburg and Haymon haven't said **** is because it would make Floyd look like an even bigger *****...if they embarrass floyd, floyd has another reason not to fight


        the last sentence sums everything up
        ex fckin actly!

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by Volcano High View Post
          Hauser: The Mayweather-Pacquiao Negotiations
          Posted Jul. 22, 2010 at 11:50am
          By Thomas Hauser



          Ellerbe’s claim is undermined by the reasonable assumption he read reports about the negotiations in the media yet never publicly suggested to anyone that the reports were wrong. At the very least, one would have expected him to pick up the phone, call Greenburg and ask, “What are these reports all about?”

          http://www.ringtv.com/blog/2145/haus..._negotiations/
          Tesla,

          Did or did Ellerbe not "suggest to everyone" that the reports of negotiation were wrong?

          Didn't Ellerbe say publicly on May 10 and June 14th (among others) that the reports of negotiation were wrong?



          Is this not a factually wrong statement by Hauser? Let's see if you can candidly admit that, or if you will blatantly lie and pretend not to understand.

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by Makavelli View Post
            i think its funny how Haymon and Greenburg thought they could get Floyd to agree after looking over Arum's proposal...the only reason why Greenburg and Haymon haven't said **** is because it would make Floyd look like an even bigger *****...if they embarrass floyd, floyd has another reason not to fight


            the last sentence sums everything up
            Exactly.. they don't want to burn bridges.. YET!. They might give it one more shot next year. Thing is, Floyd can still sign to fight, but for some reason doesn't want to.

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by Vito Corleone View Post
              Tesla,

              Did or did Ellerbe not "suggest to everyone" that the reports of negotiation were wrong?

              Didn't Ellerbe say publicly on May 10 and June 14th (among others) that the reports of negotiation were wrong?



              Is this not a factually wrong statement by Hauser? Let's see if you can candidly admit that, or if you will blatantly lie and pretend not to understand.


              Facts outweigh opinions everyday of the week and twice on Sunday. There is no way your statments can be logically disputed.

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by Vito Corleone View Post
                Tesla,

                Did or did Ellerbe not "suggest to everyone" that the reports of negotiation were wrong?

                Didn't Ellerbe say publicly on May 10 and June 14th (among others) that the reports of negotiation were wrong?



                Is this not a factually wrong statement by Hauser? Let's see if you can candidly admit that, or if you will blatantly lie and pretend not to understand.
                this idiot seems to think now that ellerbe's word is gospel.


                newsflash...

                sucking on ellerbe's **** will not make you or him a straight guy.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by Blooper View Post
                  this idiot seems to think now that ellerbe's word is gospel.


                  newsflash...

                  sucking on ellerbe's **** will not make you or him a straight guy.
                  Your ****** ass thought that Bob Arum's lie about completing a deal with GBP for the Mayweather/Pac fight was gospel. What is your point?

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by Makavelli View Post
                    i think its funny how Haymon and Greenburg thought they could get Floyd to agree after looking over Arum's proposal...the only reason why Greenburg and Haymon haven't said **** is because it would make Floyd look like an even bigger *****...if they embarrass floyd, floyd has another reason not to fight


                    the last sentence sums everything up
                    True that. The last sentence justify the means.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by T.I. View Post
                      Exactly.. they don't want to burn bridges.. YET!. They might give it one more shot next year. Thing is, Floyd can still sign to fight, but for some reason doesn't want to.


                      yup, its very simple...if Floyd wants the fight, they would drop Magarito in a heartbeat...IMO, Floyd is just waiting for PAC to sign with someone else so he doesn't have to worry about it right now

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP