Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Thomas Hauser: The Mayweather-Pacquiao Negotiations

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Maragrito been Pacs number 1 option.

    Comment


    • #52
      Originally posted by T.I. View Post
      He ain't no damn boxing fan. Guy is proudly posting messages about how NO negotiations were taking place. Dude makes no sense.
      on one thread he says there were none.

      on another he says he had "inside sources" confirming there were.

      he can't seem to make up his fckin mind.

      Comment


      • #53
        Originally posted by No Ceilings View Post
        Maragrito been Pacs number 1 option.
        is that a fact or an opinion?

        Comment


        • #54
          Originally posted by big_james10 View Post
          Hmmmm. I guess I did. I didn't mean to. Those two idiots you mentioned actually watch boxing. They are simply not very bright and have tunnel vision. Hauser is bright, but is one of those sports writers who only follows boxing when there is a big controversy or story taking place. Then they write columns like this that are based on limited facts, asinine opinions and the comments from the loudest talkers (in this case, Bob Arum).
          That is your opinion then. I do believe he is one of the more reputable writers here. Have you read his piece on the first nego with the main point of discussion being OST ... also the HBO piece... both were very impartial and well written in my opinion.

          Comment


          • #55
            Originally posted by No Ceilings View Post
            Maragrito been Pacs number 1 option.
            Pacroid wanted to fight margaret all along. And they're going where there's no drug testing at all.

            Comment


            • #56
              Originally posted by tesla_power View Post
              That is your opinion then. I do believe he is one of the more reputable writers here. Have you read his piece on the first nego with the main point of discussion being OST ... also the HBO piece... both were very impartial and well written in my opinion.
              Do you say that this one was factually inaccurate?

              Comment


              • #57
                [IMG][/IMG]
                Originally posted by Vito Corleone View Post
                Pacroid wanted to fight margaret all along. And they're going where there's no drug testing at all.

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by retnuocllup View Post
                  wow haymon trying to use the pac/mayweather fight to guarantee fights for pwill and berto on HBO.
                  I have news for you. This is common practice in boxing. How do you think Oscar De La Hoya was able to convince HBO to give him 12 dates for his fighters over the course of a year when other promoters were begging for dates. Do you actually believe that HBO was clamoring to see stinkers like Victor Ortiz-Maidana fight or Khan-Malignaggi. He did it by telling them they had to give him the dates if they wanted to broadcast his fights when he was still active. This is not unusual. All promoters do it, including Bob Arum. Haymon just happens to be the only manager with that kind of power.

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    Its amazing how people can flip **** and use context clues to come to the conclusion Floyd is scared of Manny and is sole the reason the fight didnt happen.




                    But ignore every shred of evidence of Pac and his su****ion of PED usage, painting a picture of certainty that hes clean.

                    Snr says "Pacs on PEDs" = crack head"
                    Snr says "He aint fighting unless Pac Take them test" = Hes now a reliable source of information reagarding negoations between Pac and Floyd.

                    Amazing.

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Originally posted by Vito Corleone View Post
                      Do you say that this one was factually inaccurate?
                      Dear Vito Corleone,

                      The article is one based on recent events. I believe the date and corresponding quotes are factually correct. If said writer failed to write the replies to those quotes, it is yours to provide considering you are the one dis*****g the quotes in the article. He injected his opinion of the whole ordeal which is shocking to me considering I consider the writer as reputable.

                      Hope you understand.

                      Kind regards,

                      tesla_power

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP