Comments Thread For: Schaefer: Golden Boy Promotions is Not Like Top Rank

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ngr22
    Up and Comer
    • Dec 2009
    • 45
    • 2
    • 0
    • 6,074

    #31
    GBP is not as bad as Toprank when it comes to keeping their fights in house but they have become just as sleezy and manipulative as Toprank. They are up to the same old tricks of the sleezy Don King type promoters and they are hurting the sport.

    Comment

    • KickAzz
      Banned
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Mar 2010
      • 4487
      • 59
      • 11
      • 4,761

      #32
      Originally posted by ShoulderRoll
      GBP is nowhere near as bad as Top Rank. But Marquez vs. Khan would be an example of an in-house fight from Golden Boy that most fans are against.
      GBP won't put their boxers in against dangerous opponents from other stables.

      examples:

      - mosley will never fight pwill.
      - khan will not fight bradley or alexander
      - jmm will not fight bradley or alexander

      all of schaefer's examples are of GBP fighting boxers that they are supposed to beat.

      Comment

      • disolly
        Interim Champion
        Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
        • Nov 2009
        • 942
        • 49
        • 184
        • 7,101

        #33
        they would do exactly what top rank does if they could and when they can they do. sometimes arum can really piss me off, anyone with that amount of power in a sport is gonna make calls that the fans hate but why would you not try to make superfights between two of your fighters. negotiating with another ego maniac, and his fighter, is a lot more difficult than just dealing with your 2 fighters and you make a lot more money. anyways, 99% of promoters are money grubbing douche bags, and arum/shaeffer are no exception.

        Comment

        • SocalBaller
          Amateur
          Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
          • Jun 2010
          • 29
          • 2
          • 0
          • 6,045

          #34
          GBP would do the exact same thing, except they rarely have 2 ranked boxers in the same division so their boxers have to fight someone else.

          Comment

          • King Ju-Ju
            Banned
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Jan 2010
            • 6479
            • 147
            • 38
            • 6,758

            #35
            Top Rank is #1 keeping **** in house
            Golden Boy is #2
            Now Shaw and Goosen need 2 step their games up as promoters.

            Comment

            • waxfondler
              Undisputed Champion
              • Mar 2010
              • 1438
              • 57
              • 3
              • 7,609

              #36
              bob is out of control... but GBP is doing their dirt too.

              mayweather (4/4 in-house):
              floyd/oscar (GBP in-house)
              floyd/ricky (GBP in-house)
              floyd/jmm (GBP in-house)
              floyd/shane (GBP in-house)

              manny (2/4 in-house):
              pac/oscar (TR/GBP)
              pac/ricky (TR/GBP)
              pac/cotto (TR in-house)
              pac/clottey (TR in-house)

              understandably, cash cows fighting stablemate sacrifices rather than fighting risky non-stablemates is the norm.

              Comment

              • BabyFaceAssasin
                Interim Champion
                Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                • Feb 2008
                • 756
                • 27
                • 0
                • 6,901

                #37
                There's nothing wrong with keeping the fights in-house as long as the best option is "in-house." Right now Margarito nor Cotto is the best option for Pac. Berto and Williams are the best options. Arum is full of **** for what he's doing!

                Comment

                • jbpanama
                  Big Floyd Fan
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Jan 2010
                  • 8075
                  • 107
                  • 0
                  • 20,919

                  #38
                  Originally posted by IMDAZED
                  GBP doesn't do that like Top Rank. That said, Top Rank does a much better job putting on competitive bouts. Mosley-Mora? Schafer should just be quiet.
                  PIMPS have a HARD TIME, keeping QUIET!!!

                  Comment

                  • JAGAGON51
                    Amateur
                    Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
                    • Jan 2006
                    • 13
                    • 0
                    • 0
                    • 6,262

                    #39
                    Gbp is better off without shaffer

                    This guy Shaffer is the most corrupt in the boxing industry. He is manipulative, deceiving, liar, dishonest, etc.. I have a long list to elaborate but it will not fit in this box. I am not a madam Auring but i can see it in his face. Him and Mayweather are in the same feather.

                    Comment

                    • Emiliano Zapata
                      Up and Comer
                      Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
                      • Aug 2009
                      • 44
                      • 1
                      • 0
                      • 6,067

                      #40
                      That's RIGHT!!!

                      GBP is far less superior than Top Rank. GBP total earnings is not even half that of Top Rank. GBP promotes gays and cowards.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP