They Just Tore Floyds A$$ Up On PTI

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jrosales13
    undisputed champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2008
    • 32632
    • 738
    • 763
    • 40,023

    #351
    One more thing I want to add about this court of public opinion...

    Lets not forget...

    That Around the Horn back in January ****ted on Pac...

    They were saying for Pac to take the test. If anybody can find that video where they're saying take the test. It would be appreciate it.

    However, they just did a 180 and that is what I mean in the public court of opinion as of right now Floyd looks like a coward. Now that might all change but as of today he does. Right or wrong fair or not that is how it is looking.

    Comment

    • baracuda
      Banned
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Mar 2009
      • 10779
      • 259
      • 569
      • 11,470

      #352
      Originally posted by jrosales13
      Why talk about two different religions and belief?
      The Ring stop claiming champs when it when bankrupt and when they started they started all over and forgot lineage history... Thus Roy being the ring champ but he was not really the lineal champ...

      When it comes to lineage BoxingScene and cyberboxing are more credible than the Ring. The Ring however, is more credible than any of the sanctioning bodies.

      Talking about I am a bigger IMDAZED fan is ignorant... Acting like Oscar had massive balls and was an ATG just cuz you don't like Floyd is ignorant... I can keep going if you want...
      i was'nt talking about religion, i was simply comparing what you said , since the ring is the bble of boxing.....like i said ,to you it is more credible, but you cant blame others for thinking otherwise since we all know " the ring's past reputation"....they dont call it the bible of boxing for nothing......you play the nsb police when someone says ****** things but when it's imdazed talking garbage like sayin" pac's needs to prove he aint dirty" or " pac's terms aint fair" etc, you do nothing but nuthug his ass!...lol

      in the oscar thread you claim tht floyd had more balls tho you refiuse to say why you think that......you refused to vote too,we all know it was so obviuos who had the better comp........it was clear you said what you said since you hate oscar..meaing youre doing what you think is messed up others are doing.lol..that is all i was sayin.....

      Comment

      • jrosales13
        undisputed champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Sep 2008
        • 32632
        • 738
        • 763
        • 40,023

        #353
        Originally posted by sicko
        now all of a Sudden what PTI has to say is important, when was the last time they even talked about boxing? In fact only time they and ESPN in general even talk about boxing is when it is about Mayweather, they don't give a **** about any other fighter, they don't even talk about Pacman unless it has something to do with Mayweather
        Is it fair to say that the last time PTI talk to Floyd it had to do with Pac?

        Hell is it safe to say that the last time ESPN has talk with Floyd it had something to do with Pac?

        Comment

        • Ragnar Lothbrok
          Banned
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • May 2010
          • 6329
          • 532
          • 573
          • 7,422

          #354
          Originally posted by sicko
          now all of a Sudden what PTI has to say is important, when was the last time they even talked about boxing? In fact only time they and ESPN in general even talk about boxing is when it is about Mayweather, they don't give a **** about any other fighter, they don't even talk about Pacman unless it has something to do with Mayweather

          everytime there is a big fight pti, around the horn, jim rome is burning cover it.


          stop ****ing lying. they might talk about for a couple of minutes, but they still talk about it.


          im a sports junkie. ive been following sports & espn for a long time. they talk about boxing. not much. but they do. whenever there is a big fight they talk about it.

          to say they never talk boxing is both ignorant & ******.

          Comment

          • B.U.R.N.E.R
            ~NSB Legend 2005-2015~
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Feb 2010
            • 30186
            • 1,344
            • 400
            • 47,475

            #355
            Originally posted by Clayton Bigsby
            everytime there is a big fight pti, around the horn, jim rome is burning cover it.


            stop ****ing lying. they might talk about for a couple of minutes, but they still talk about it.


            im a sports junkie. ive been following sports & espn for a long time. they talk about boxing. not much. but they do. whenever there is a big fight they talk about it.

            to say they never talk boxing is both ignorant & ******.

            Bingo.

            They are casual fans. Please dont compare them to Jim Rome.

            Comment

            • B.U.R.N.E.R
              ~NSB Legend 2005-2015~
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Feb 2010
              • 30186
              • 1,344
              • 400
              • 47,475

              #356
              Pac fans are a good daily source of humor.

              Floyd looks like a coward right now to them but Pac can fight Marg or Cotto and cheat history and looks like a warrior?

              **** outta here.

              Comment

              • qwerty07
                Interim Champion
                Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                • Apr 2010
                • 628
                • 18
                • 0
                • 6,774

                #357
                Originally posted by jrosales13
                Of course they would.

                Pac beat Barrera for the lineal featherweight title... And, Pac never held a major sanctioning belt(WBC, WBA, IBF, WBO, even maybe now IBO) at 126. Yet was the lineal champ which helps him with his 4 and 4 and 7 and 7.

                You don't need one of those bull**** garbage ass sanctioning belts to be considered the lineal.

                So is not meaningless whatsoever...

                Again being the lineal champ doesn't mean you the best fighter in the division it just means you're the real champ of the division...

                When a fighter like Oscar won 6 and 6 it just shows how eh that accomplishment really is...

                But, when Pac wins 4 and 4 and maybe get 5 and 5 at 3 of the original 8 weight-classes. Now that is something special.
                OK, so like I said, it's a nice stat for your resume, but if there's not more demand for it, then it's "market value" is only at the level of the other sanctioning belts, even if there is deeper history/meaning to that belt.

                It's like this: If you follow golf, you know that there's 4 tournaments every year called "majors." Now, what keeps the best players coming back to these tourneys it isn't only the prestige/history, but it also has the largest prize pool of any other tourneys, and more sponsors tend to wanna sponsor you if you win those. That's what gives golf majors "value" to the players.

                With the way boxing works, even though the lineal belt has more prestige/history, it's all about prize money. So if I had the dilemma of fighting a guy for a lineal belt for $1 million or fighting a guy for the WBA belt for $2 million (for various reasons), then I (and ALL boxers) would fight the second guy. So the value of the lineal belt goes down to all the other belts' level because of the lack of incentive and demand for it.

                Hope you understand what I'm trying to say.

                Comment

                • Ragnar Lothbrok
                  Banned
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • May 2010
                  • 6329
                  • 532
                  • 573
                  • 7,422

                  #358
                  Originally posted by No Ceilings

                  Bingo.

                  They are casual fans. Please dont compare them to Jim Rome.


                  no bingo.

                  ive already explained this to you in post #340.


                  How do you know how much boxing knowledge bob ryan & wilbon have based on a 30 minute show where they talk about all sports & they have no control on the content?


                  How?

                  Comment

                  • Franco2012
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Jun 2010
                    • 5626
                    • 211
                    • 139
                    • 12,109

                    #359
                    Burner is crying like a little sissy.

                    His kamikaze attempts to make Floyd look good is f....... pathetic!

                    Comment

                    • The Comedian
                      Banned
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Apr 2010
                      • 2277
                      • 149
                      • 2
                      • 2,567

                      #360
                      Originally posted by Clayton Bigsby
                      no bingo.

                      ive already explained this to you in post #340.


                      How do you know how much boxing knowledge bob ryan & wilbon have based on a 30 minute show where they talk about all sports & they have no control on the content?


                      How?
                      When they have made comments in past shows like " I didnt even know the guy (Pacquiao) before last year"

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP