They Just Tore Floyds A$$ Up On PTI
Collapse
-
-
What this junkie *****s are gonna say next
That Bob Arum payed money to PTI to diss Gayweather?Comment
-
Lmfao.
PTI hosts are CASUAL fans.
You do know that Tyson-Spinks was one of the most hyped heavyweight fights ever right?
lmfao.
So because they talked Tyson-Spinks means they are hardcore fans? Tyson-Spinks was a Glamour fight it wasnt some hardcore fight between some up and comers...lol.Comment
-
I got a question: If the lineal title holder doesn't hold a belt like the WBC, WBA, etc, and a guy beats him, is that guy considered a champ at that weight? Meaning will history recognize him as a champ at that weight as they do for Pac for 7 weight classes?
If no, then there really is no point like I said.
If yes, then it still wouldn't be more valuable than the other belts because there is no extra incentive for boxers to sought that belt over other belts.
Pac beat Barrera for the lineal featherweight title... And, Pac never held a major sanctioning belt(WBC, WBA, IBF, WBO, even maybe now IBO) at 126. Yet was the lineal champ which helps him with his 4 and 4 and 7 and 7.
You don't need one of those bull**** garbage ass sanctioning belts to be considered the lineal.
So is not meaningless whatsoever...
Again being the lineal champ doesn't mean you the best fighter in the division it just means you're the real champ of the division...
When a fighter like Oscar won 6 and 6 it just shows how eh that accomplishment really is...
But, when Pac wins 4 and 4 and maybe get 5 and 5 at 3 of the original 8 weight-classes. Now that is something special.Comment
-
Undefeated boxer vs Punching Machine
Thats more impressive then "Do you think that Jake LaMotta was afraid to get in the ring with SRR"Comment
-
Around the Horn about GAYWEATHER
00:14:36 The latest supposed deadline for mayweather-pacquiao tomorrow.
00:14:38 The latest supposed update, not good.
00:14:39 Doesn't look like mayweather will sign on the line.
00:14:40 Whether this qualifies as ducking, something for you guys to debate in a second.
00:14:48 Here's bert sugar's take -- "he doesn't want to fight right now.
00:14:50 He's not afraid of pacquiao.
00:14:50 He might be afraid of losing.
00:14:51 If you ever talk to him he will tell you in eight seconds or less he's the greatest fighter ever because he's never lost and " what do you think, cowlishaw?
00:15:03 >> Well, I think those are kind of the same things.
00:15:06 I think he does want to keep his record intact but I think historically this fight will happen.
00:15:14 How many great fighters this kind of money on the table.
00:15:17 >> So you still think it's going to happen?
00:15:20 >> It may be next year but it will happen.
00:15:23 >> Maybe next year but there are no signs of that right now.
00:15:27 Sound to me like bert sugar is saying that floyd is afraid of playing -- fighting pacquiao because maybe mack -- pacquiao can beat him.
00:15:41 >> There are no more excuses right now for mayweather.
00:15:46 I think mayweather is more concerned with that solitary zero in the loss column with all the zeros in the paycheck he could get.
00:15:55 >> I think he is afraid of losing.
00:15:58 I think he's afraid of fighting pacquiao.
00:16:01 He cannot go around saying he's the greatest fighter ever if he's not going to do it.
00:16:08 We had a pig yesterday.
00:16:10 In my mind he's a chicken.
00:16:12 >> Do you think it's a mark against his career if he doesn't fight pacquiao.
can you post the around the horn video?Comment
-
now all of a Sudden what PTI has to say is important, when was the last time they even talked about boxing? In fact only time they and ESPN in general even talk about boxing is when it is about Mayweather, they don't give a **** about any other fighter, they don't even talk about Pacman unless it has something to do with MayweatherComment
-
now all of a Sudden what PTI has to say is important, when was the last time they even talked about boxing? In fact only time they and ESPN in general even talk about boxing is when it is about Mayweather, they don't give a **** about any other fighter, they don't even talk about Pacman unless it has something to do with Mayweather
Exactly..........
lolololComment
-
Comment
-
now all of a Sudden what PTI has to say is important, when was the last time they even talked about boxing? In fact only time they and ESPN in general even talk about boxing is when it is about Mayweather, they don't give a **** about any other fighter, they don't even talk about Pacman unless it has something to do with MayweatherComment
Comment