Team Pac is full if it!

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Russian Crushin
    atheist with a gun
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Dec 2009
    • 33788
    • 1,472
    • 836
    • 46,625

    #21
    Originally posted by IMDAZED
    Arum is still sour over Oscar doing the same thing. He hates Oscar with a passion . I never understood before but over the past couple years I finally caught on to what Mayweather kept saying about Cotto needing to become his own man and then they could make the fight happen. Basically, leave Arum.
    Oh please, Arum has been giving Cotto the best fighters in the world. May didnt want a prime Cotto and then didnt want Cotto after he was beatin because he was "damaged goods"

    Its not Arums Fault Cotto couldnt beat Marg and Pac

    Comment

    • Chuckguy
      Undisputed Champion
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Jun 2008
      • 13927
      • 345
      • 183
      • 58,389

      #22
      Originally posted by yevskiy426
      Obviously, they agreed to keep the terms a secret. If Floyd rejects it, i just wanna hear exactly why he did.

      Anyway if 2 sides agree on something that means they are both fine with it, so what does it matter what the terms are? The point is they BOTH agreed to it
      But the one saying that they both agreed to the terms is Arum a known liar. Richard Schaffer Oscar or AL Haymon have not mentioned anything

      so to me arum is not credible and we can only wait and see

      Comment

      • Chuckguy
        Undisputed Champion
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Jun 2008
        • 13927
        • 345
        • 183
        • 58,389

        #23
        Originally posted by yevskiy426
        Oh please, Arum has been giving Cotto the best fighters in the world. May didnt want a prime Cotto and then didnt want Cotto after he was beatin because he was "damaged goods"

        Its not Arums Fault Cotto couldnt beat Marg and Pac
        the common denominator in all that is arum
        he would rather match up his own fighters against each other than risk losing money and having them especially manny pac take a risky fight

        we all know Floyd doesnt take risks but if you look at it neither does manny and bob

        Comment

        • Pacquiao'd
          Banned
          • Mar 2010
          • 11948
          • 612
          • 153
          • 12,591

          #24
          bump........

          Comment

          • Russian Crushin
            atheist with a gun
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Dec 2009
            • 33788
            • 1,472
            • 836
            • 46,625

            #25
            Originally posted by Chuckguy
            But the one saying that they both agreed to the terms is Arum a known liar. Richard Schaffer Oscar or AL Haymon have not mentioned anything

            so to me arum is not credible and we can only wait and see
            Im not sure how the man who represents Pac in Negotiations is not credible.

            But Arum said they agreed to terms, and GBP have not denied it. The whole Pac/Floyd fiasco has been about egos and placing blame on the other person to why the fight hasnt happened. So if Arum is lying, you best beleive GBP and Floyd would just be ripping the **** out of him.

            Ill follow the facts and leave the conspiracy theories behind, you should do the same

            Comment

            • Pacquiao'd
              Banned
              • Mar 2010
              • 11948
              • 612
              • 153
              • 12,591

              #26
              Originally posted by yevskiy426
              Im not sure how the man who represents Pac in Negotiations is not credible.

              But Arum said they agreed to terms, and GBP have not denied it. The whole Pac/Floyd fiasco has been about egos and placing blame on the other person to why the fight hasnt happened. So if Arum is lying, you best beleive GBP and Floyd would just be ripping the **** out of him.

              Ill follow the facts and leave the conspiracy theories behind, you should do the same
              what terms guy. 60/40 and no cut off days or the 50/50 and 14 days pac didnt want and walked away from which are the same terms floyd said were off the table?

              so what are you talkign about guy

              Comment

              • Chuckguy
                Undisputed Champion
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Jun 2008
                • 13927
                • 345
                • 183
                • 58,389

                #27
                Originally posted by yevskiy426
                Im not sure how the man who represents Pac in Negotiations is not credible.

                But Arum said they agreed to terms, and GBP have not denied it. The whole Pac/Floyd fiasco has been about egos and placing blame on the other person to why the fight hasnt happened. So if Arum is lying, you best beleive GBP and Floyd would just be ripping the **** out of him.

                Ill follow the facts and leave the conspiracy theories behind, you should do the same
                How is that a consiracy theory?
                Arum also said that a 14 day cut off date was never agreed to by Floyd but he retracked his comment after the truth came out in mediations
                hello

                again Arum is saying both sides have agreed
                if so why hasnt GBP come out and comfirm yes we are just waiting for Floyd to sign
                they said it when SSM and him agreed to sign and we waited a couple weeks for FLoyd to sign
                why wouldnt they say it now?
                maybe because Arum is full of **** and there has been no agreement
                maybe because Arum would rather have Manny fight a easier fight in Margs and keep it in house?

                Look I hope Bobby proves me wrong and I hope Floydie signs but I doubt an agreement has been reached

                Comment

                • Russian Crushin
                  atheist with a gun
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Dec 2009
                  • 33788
                  • 1,472
                  • 836
                  • 46,625

                  #28
                  Originally posted by yesir
                  what terms guy. 60/40 and no cut off days or the 50/50 and 14 days pac didnt want and walked away from which are the same terms floyd said were off the table?

                  so what are you talkign about guy
                  What does it matter what terms they agreed on? The point is they AGREED on it

                  I dont care it its 90/10 and testing into the 8th round

                  The only part i care about is that they AGREED on it. Why are people so obsessed what the terms were exactly

                  Definition of Agreed: To come to an understanding or to terms

                  Comment

                  • Russian Crushin
                    atheist with a gun
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Dec 2009
                    • 33788
                    • 1,472
                    • 836
                    • 46,625

                    #29
                    Originally posted by Chuckguy
                    How is that a consiracy theory?
                    Arum also said that a 14 day cut off date was never agreed to by Floyd but he retracked his comment after the truth came out in mediations
                    hello

                    again Arum is saying both sides have agreed
                    if so why hasnt GBP come out and comfirm yes we are just waiting for Floyd to sign
                    they said it when SSM and him agreed to sign and we waited a couple weeks for FLoyd to sign
                    why wouldnt they say it now?
                    maybe because Arum is full of **** and there has been no agreement
                    maybe because Arum would rather have Manny fight a easier fight in Margs and keep it in house?

                    Look I hope Bobby proves me wrong and I hope Floydie signs but I doubt an agreement has been reached
                    Because you are saying that you think they agreed on and what you think Arum did or didnt do

                    I read that they agree on terms and the terms were full testing and 50/50(which are just rumors)

                    Its been 2 weeks since i read it and in the 2 weeks time nobody from GBP has disproved it.

                    Pac is not Mosley and has a fight Nov 13 with or without Floyd. So if Floyd doesnt agree to it by mid July, please explain to me exactly why Pac would keep waiting any farther? Its less then 4 months before the fight and waiting for Floyd to decide "whenever he is ready" doesnt make sense

                    Comment

                    • infamous larryx
                      Banned
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Jan 2010
                      • 10881
                      • 512
                      • 265
                      • 1,565

                      #30
                      please tell me what terms floyd agreed to ??the first time around arum said everything was agreed to and he was flying to get manny to sign..only for manny to disagree and not sign anything...floyd signed the first time and people still say he was ducking manny..so why are ya'll listening to arum now??just cause hes making floyd look bad this time around???its sickening

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP