Is there a significant benefit for boxers to roid up 14 days before a fight?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • IMDAZED
    Fair but Firm
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • May 2006
    • 42644
    • 1,134
    • 1,770
    • 67,152

    #191
    Originally posted by AFighter4U
    Within and BEYOND 14 days to get his desired results. Apparently he did cuz he won via UD over dela hoya.
    You've been proven wrong. Oh well. Please keep making desperate posts now for our amusement.

    Comment

    • Vadrigar.
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • May 2010
      • 8134
      • 517
      • 415
      • 20,350

      #192
      I'm watching this. Should be quite funny.........

      Comment

      • AFighter4U
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jan 2010
        • 3576
        • 63
        • 0
        • 9,768

        #193
        Originally posted by -D33Pwaters-
        Unless a high likelihood of injury is proven without a cut off date.
        If i remember correctly, DOCTORS, not fans, or mere spectators mentioned the clear possibility of a danger for having no cut-off in the blood testing.

        Fans want no cut-off. Doctors warn of the clear danger for boxers tested of no cut-off.

        I'd listen to the doctors.

        Sorry for no link. This was when USADA and WADA were debating the merits of random blood tests.

        Comment

        • IMDAZED
          Fair but Firm
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • May 2006
          • 42644
          • 1,134
          • 1,770
          • 67,152

          #194
          Originally posted by -D33Pwaters-
          I'm watching this. Should be quite funny.........

          Actually, it's sad.

          Comment

          • Vadrigar.
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • May 2010
            • 8134
            • 517
            • 415
            • 20,350

            #195
            Originally posted by AFighter4U
            If i remember correctly, DOCTORS, not fans, or mere spectators mentioned the clear possibility of a danger for having no cut-off in the blood testing.

            Fans want no cut-off. Doctors warn of the clear danger for boxers tested of no cut-off.

            I'd listen to the doctors.

            Sorry for no link. This was when USADA and WADA were debating the merits of random blood tests.
            I'll give you the link. Quotes are from the video in this thread:

            Comment

            • Vadrigar.
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • May 2010
              • 8134
              • 517
              • 415
              • 20,350

              #196
              Originally posted by IMDAZED
              Actually, it's sad.
              So why do you keep on responding to him? you've proven him wong.

              he's never going to admit it.

              Comment

              • IMDAZED
                Fair but Firm
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • May 2006
                • 42644
                • 1,134
                • 1,770
                • 67,152

                #197
                Originally posted by -D33Pwaters-
                So why do you keep on responding to him? you've been proven him wong.
                Nah, my work is done here. That post was my final response to him.

                Comment

                • BattlingNelson
                  Mod a Phukka
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Mar 2008
                  • 29839
                  • 3,246
                  • 3,190
                  • 286,536

                  #198
                  Originally posted by IMDAZED
                  See what I copied and pasted above from Conte.

                  Add that to what I copied and pasted from Conte before.

                  Then burn down this thread.
                  Despite being a dirty rotten scumbag Conte knows his PED's. I'm amazed that some people in this thread just wont acknowledge the facts. I guess that's NSB for ya'.

                  Comment

                  • AFighter4U
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Jan 2010
                    • 3576
                    • 63
                    • 0
                    • 9,768

                    #199
                    Originally posted by IMDAZED
                    You've been proven wrong. Oh well. Please keep making desperate posts now for our amusement.
                    Where may i ask was i proven wrong?

                    While it takes at least two weeks to get a benefit from taking EPO for boxers (this is according to conte and not me btw), there is no way a boxer would allow himself to train intensely for fourteen days straight AND then fight the very next day after the fourteenth day of "intense" training. (again conte's words and not mine).

                    If you simply cannot see the logic in that, then there's simply no helping it.

                    Comment

                    • Vadrigar.
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • May 2010
                      • 8134
                      • 517
                      • 415
                      • 20,350

                      #200
                      Originally posted by AFighter4U
                      Where may i ask was i proven wrong?

                      While it takes at least two weeks to get a benefit from taking EPO for boxers (this is according to conte and not me btw), there is no way a boxer would allow himself to train intensely for fourteen days straight AND then fight the very next day after the fourteenth day of "intense" training. (again conte's words and not mine).

                      If you simply cannot see the logic in that, then there's simply no helping it.
                      So in other words, it's counter productive.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP