This is ****ing ******. They dont generate interests because heavyweights go, they're boring. has nothing to do with their ethnicity/nationality. Grow the **** up children.
the majority of the UFC stars are ****ing white you morons and are ovbviously popular in America, but the Klitchko brothers are BORING to the American public. Why the *** would HBO continue showing their fights when they have the lowest ratings on the network? WHY?
Hatton was 40-0 before HBO finally allowed him on, and even after he defeated Tszyu and won the Ring title, they still wouldn't televise his next fight.
Then Greenburg tried to set him up to lose, against a bigger southpaw. Hatton managed to win, although the lying Kellerman still says "most people thought Colazzo won".
Amir Khan hasn't accomplished half as much.
And like I posted before, Greenburg has become MORE prejudiced against white boxers the past year or two.
Accomplished twice as much as Khan before they had him on. Won the Ring title at 140 by defeating an ATG, but HBO still wouldn't televise his next two fights. Then they set him up to lose, by demanding he move up in weight to fight a bigger southpaw in order to appear on HBO. He won anyway.
Some weak excuses here blaming race and nationality but there are no competitive or interesting fights, no unifications, just a on-going "bum of the month club".
This is ****ing ******. They dont generate interests because heavyweights go, they're boring. has nothing to do with their ethnicity/nationality. Grow the **** up children.
the majority of the UFC stars are ****ing white you morons and are ovbviously popular in America, but the Klitchko brothers are BORING to the American public. Why the *** would HBO continue showing their fights when they have the lowest ratings on the network? WHY?
And there you have it, folks. This is the truth. Stop over thinking it with all the ignorant ethnic/nationality nonsense.
Hatton was 40-0 before HBO finally allowed him on, and even after he defeated Tszyu and won the Ring title, they still wouldn't televise his next fight.
Then Greenburg tried to set him up to lose, against a bigger southpaw. Hatton managed to win, although the lying Kellerman still says "most people thought Colazzo won".
Amir Khan hasn't accomplished half as much.
And like I posted before, Greenburg has become MORE prejudiced against white boxers the past year or two.
Because he fought in England. HBO doesn't go overseas that often anymore unless it's a fight worth showing such as Kessler-Calzaghe.
They are both white too by the way. What racist bastards they were showing those fighters.
Hatton was 40-0 before HBO finally allowed him on, and even after he defeated Tszyu and won the Ring title, they still wouldn't televise his next fight.
Then Greenburg tried to set him up to lose, against a bigger southpaw. Hatton managed to win, although the lying Kellerman still says "most people thought Colazzo won".
Amir Khan hasn't accomplished half as much.
And like I posted before, Greenburg has become MORE prejudiced against white boxers the past year or two.
Accomplished twice as much as Khan before they had him on. Won the Ring title at 140 by defeating an ATG, but HBO still wouldn't televise his next two fights. Then they set him up to lose, by demanding he move up in weight to fight a bigger southpaw in order to appear on HBO. He won anyway.
Those pretty much sum it up and great AV by the way. Also British isn't as much of a "problem" as Eastern Europeans and especially when youre talking about 140 vs HW's
Comment