Floyds "tax issue" for the year, for possibly not fighting in 2010?
Collapse
-
-
in the case of mayweather, he has a legitimate reason to be concern about taxes
he just had to pay 8 million in back taxes + 35% in sep. And had to pay 35% in may for mosley.
so considering his circumstances you can not blame him
for being concern about more taxes. So it is understandable ...Comment
-
so the tax excuse is not legit then reed?
could this turn into the spin off version of a boat is not a investment thread?Comment
-
Take his balls out of your throat dude it's disgusting.Comment
-
that's not a sure thing...if mayweather promotions is a registered business entity it may even end up with a net loss for the year and doesn't have to pay taxes. it all depends on how much income they earn against their total expenses.Comment
-
For Floyd.. He is the 2nd highest paid athlete in the us. Floyd reaches the max tax brackets with just one fight.
Earning a bit less in a year for Floyd will do no good since he is clearing the highest bracket by such a large marginComment
-
While that may be true there is a limit on the amount of expenses you can write off. With the type of cash these fights are pulling in, it is without a doubt they are clearing the mark..Comment
-
I prefer to wait and see before i make comments based on information we don't know is even true.
Do we even know Floyd wants 60%?? Do we know what compromise was reached (if one was) for OST? Do we know what terms Floyd is looking at right now?? Do we actually know anything at all??????? The answer is no.....we can just speculate.......
i had one point and one point precisely. It makes little sense that 2 parties are going to come to any mutual agreement whilst one of the parties is suing the other. You, being a dumbass automatically assume this observation is tantamount to me not wanting to see this fight. ......and i'm the one with balls in my mouth??Comment
Comment