Originally posted by Bozo_no_no
What's with the Klitschko bashers anyway?
Collapse
-
Originally posted by scapRahman beat Sanders more convincingly....Bozo you just made a bozo nono...
Rahman was flat on his ass in that fight, and was repeatedly hurt...it was not a one sided beating.
Now VK was rocked in a few rounds by Sanders but he also dished out a pretty good drubbing... watch the fights again...VK had an easier time with Sanders than Rock did.
Rahman stopped him quicker.
This was also when Sanders was in much better shape (ten pounds lighter) and when he was 34, not 38 and coming in after one year's inactivity like he was agaisnt Klitschko.
Tubbs walked in and destroyed Sanders.
Sorry to burst your bubble, but you'll have to keep hanging off my posts looking for something else to jump in on.Comment
-
Originally posted by Bozo_no_noRahman dropped Sanders, and Klitschko did not.
Rahman stopped him quicker, and dropped him.
This was also when Sanders was in much better shape (ten pounds lighter) and when he was 34, not 38 and coming in after one year's inactivity like he was agaisnt Klitschko.
Sorry to burst your bubble, but you'll have to keep hanging off my posts looking for something else to jump in on.
For the most part the Sanders Klitchko fight was a domination, the rahman sanders fight was a war.
Sure if you want to bring up age, rock fought a better version of corrie sanders but he did not beat corrie sanders more impressively...Rock was distraught after that fight and after his performance...in fact he contemplated retirementafter the fight because he struggled so badly with Sanders...
But your right Rahman had an easier time with Sanders than Vitally did...Im not defending VK...just responding to a bad post thats all.
Me and you Bozo, were taking over!Comment
-
Originally posted by scapFor the most part the Sanders Klitchko fight was a domination, the rahman sanders fight was a war.
Sure if you want to bring up age, rock fought a better version of corrie sanders but he did not beat corrie sanders more impressively...Rock was distraught after that fight and after his performance...in fact he contemplated retirementafter the fight because he struggled so badly with Sanders...
But your right Rahman had an easier time with Sanders than Vitally did...Im not defending VK...just responding to a bad post thats all.
Me and you Bozo, were taking over!
The point was Corrie Sanders WAS NOT an impressive win for Klitscho.
Sanders was 38, had been inactive for a year, and looked like he had a grandfather's build:

Rahman fought a younger and more active Sanders, and stopped quicker and dropped him:

The point was, Sanders at 38 years old and inactive one year was NOT an impressive win in the context of world title class.
I realize you're eager to jump on anything I say you can, but look at the overall point of something I'm saying before you look to pounce on it.Comment
-
Oh, and here's Nate Tubbs (http://www.boxrec.com/boxer_display.php?boxer_id=005751) getting it done in the 2nd round:
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bozo_no_noOh, and here's Nate Tubbs (http://www.boxrec.com/boxer_display.php?boxer_id=005751) getting it done in the 2nd round:

yeah and george foreman beat joe frazier in two rounds. it didnt make him better than muhammad ali.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hitman932yeah and george foreman beat joe frazier in two rounds. it didnt make him better than muhammad ali.
Try reading.
The point wasn't who's better than who.
It was that Corey Sanders, at 38 years old, out of shape, and a year out of the ring, was NOT a win to brag about.
He was beaten soundly and quicker when he was younger and more fit by lesser fighters. (Tubbs obviously the lesser fighter, Rahman still up in the air).Comment
-
That, my friend, is one hell of a good post. You hit it right on the head. Have some Karma.Originally posted by TorinoFirst of all, Vitali fought 12/11/04. Less than 7 months ago.
Second, I agree and would like to see him fight those guys too. However, If he fights these guys and wins like I hope he does, the haters will find a way to discredit those opponents as well.
Here, let me show you,
If Vitali fights and wins against,
Toney - Fat, old and too short. Just a blown up middle weight.
Rahman - Fat, out of shape B class fighter, who only got lucky with one punch against Lewis.
Byrd - Another blown up middle weight, old, slow and past his prime.
Ruiz - Slow paper champion who has a reputation for getting beat by middle weights.
Brewster - Fat, out of shape, B class boxer that got one lucky punch with Golota.
I'll even go further,
Brock - Not ready for a title fight.
Valuev - a freak that never fought anyone.
Peter - Not enough experience.
Barrett - B class fighter
The bottom line is the haters will never do anything but hate. It doesn't matter who Vitali fights.
One thing I'm convinced of, the reason for their hate has nothing to do with boxing and probably has everything to do with race, religion, nationality or whatever.Comment
-
Don't you Klitschko supporters want to see him fight at least one mandatory challenger? Just one?! Are you really satisfied with opponents like 38 year old, semi-retired Corrie Sanders and complete garbage like Danny Williams and, God forbid, Kevin McBride?
We're going on 15 months now that he has held the WBC title, and he hasn't faced a single mandatory challenger. Not one. And does it really surprise you that there are people who are getting a little fed up with it? If Rahman beats Barrett and is in shape and available to fight Vitali on September 24, will you still stand by him?Comment
Comment