What's with the Klitschko bashers anyway?

[DiegoFuego]

so isn't Sam Peter on Vitali's level then? Sam Peter has the same knockout percentage as Vitali so shouldn't he be tied with Vitali? Idiot

[Bozo_no no]

i was not commenting on all that other stuff you mentioned... i'm not going to get into all that.... but i am glad to see that you agree with me in regards to VK's resume and the rest of the division... i will say this though, there is large fanbase for VK and there is an equaly large non-fan base...

Don't cry about why he gets so much critisism then.

You have mentioned several times in several threads that he gets slighted a lot despite there being other title holders with weak resumes and inactivity.

Once again, that's not the point, because those fighters don't have OVERWHELMING RABBID fanatics touting them as the best Heavyweight in the world.

The (justified) critisisms of Vitali are DWARFED by the overwhelming unjustufued hype surrounding him.

[Double]

If Klitschko ever unifies the belts he has all my respect.

[scap]

so isn't Sam Peter on Vitali's level then? Sam Peter has the same knockout percentage as Vitali so shouldn't he be tied with Vitali? Idiot

Without a doubt 1 of the if not the best poster on the site! Keep it up Fuego!

[Bozo_no no]

this is just my opinion, but the fact that VK is winning impressively while the other guys are struggling to win, makes him the #1 guy in my book...

That is weak.

Becaue LOOK at who he's been fighting.

San Sanial Sam knocked out Danny Williams quicker. Nate Tubbs (look this guy up) and Hassim Rahman beat Corrie Sanders quicker and much more convincingly.

The argument that Vitali "has been winning more impressivly" is a tired and played out nut hugging assertion.

It's as tired as touting his high KO%. If you'd care to look into his KO%, before 2003 it was highlighted by names like Orlin Norris and Obed Sullivan, and then littered with German club fighters.

His two wins over Danny Williams and Corrie Sanders in the last 18th months are not the least bit impressive on a World title class level, no matter how you choose to sugar coat it.

[guru]

so isn't Sam Peter on Vitali's level then? Sam Peter has the same knockout percentage as Vitali so shouldn't he be tied with Vitali? Idiot

insults are unnecessary.... simple answer, peter has a high KO%, but his opposition is unheralded... when you compare VK to the other champs, their competition is equal, but VK is winning handily, while they are not....

[guru]

Don't cry about why he gets so much critisism then.

You have mentioned several times in several threads that he gets slighted a lot despite there being other title holders with weak resumes and inactivity.

Once again, that's not the point, because those fighters don't have OVERWHELMING RABBID fanatics touting them as the best Heavyweight in the world.

The (justified) critisisms of Vitali are DWARFED by the overwhelming unjustufued hype surrounding him.

haters can hate, i dont mind that... but when they make comments that are not right, like VK's resume is so much weaker than everyone else, thats when i'll correct them...

[guru]

That is weak.

Becaue LOOK at who he's been fighting.

San Sanial Sam knocked out Danny Williams quicker. Nate Tubbs (look this guy up) and Hassim Rahman beat Corrie Sanders quicker and much more convincingly.

The argument that Vitali "has been winning more impressivly" is a tired and played out nut hugging assertion.

It's as tired as touting his high KO%. If you'd care to look into his KO%, before 2003 it was highlighted by names like Orlin Norris and Obed Sullivan, and then littered with German club fighters.

His two wins over Danny Williams and Corrie Sanders in the last 18th months are not the least bit impressive on a World title class level, no matter how you choose to sugar coat it.

like i said it just my opinion, knocking out williams/sanders/KJ is more impressive to me than getting draws or split decisions over fres/golota/mccline... and that's why i rate him #1 in the division

[scap]

That is weak.

Becaue LOOK at who he's been fighting.

San Sanial Sam knocked out Danny Williams quicker. Nate Tubbs (look this guy up) and Hassim Rahman beat Corrie Sanders quicker and much more convincingly.

The argument that Vitali "has been winning more impressivly" is a tired and played out nut hugging assertion.

It's as tired as touting his high KO%. If you'd care to look into his KO%, before 2003 it was highlighted by names like Orlin Norris and Obed Sullivan, and then littered with German club fighters.


His two wins over Danny Williams and Corrie Sanders in the last 18th months are not the least bit impressive on a World title class level, no matter how you choose to sugar coat it.

Rahman beat Sanders more convincingly....Bozo you just made a bozo nono...

Rahman was flat on his ass in that fight, and was repeatedly hurt...it was not a one sided beating.

Now VK was rocked in a few rounds by Sanders but he also dished out a pretty good drubbing... watch the fights again...VK had an easier time with Sanders than Rock did.

[Bozo_no no]

like i said it just my opinion, knocking out williams/sanders/KJ is more impressive to me than getting draws or split decisions over fres/golota/mccline... and that's why i rate him #1 in the division

And that's where the classic fanatic line of thinking comes in, talking about how feared and credible Corrie Sanders is.

Sanders and Williams are an absolute joke when their trying to be used to justify a guy based on wins over him.

You rate Klitschko #1 because you're a jock sniffer who's convinced himself of somehting that's totally up in the air. His wins over Sanders and Williams doen't mean anything.

The title holders are all on par about now, and it's henceforth that one of them is going to prove his worth over the others.