Why didnt pac ever fight zahir raheem?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Russian Crushin
    atheist with a gun
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Dec 2009
    • 33788
    • 1,472
    • 836
    • 46,625

    #31
    Originally posted by pistol whip
    Someone needs to explain to this guy that a diaretic is not a PED.
    I also hate that every PED is refered to as a "steriod" when most PEDs arent

    And yea diaretics arent PEDs, they are just banned substances

    Comment

    • brick wall
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Feb 2008
      • 6480
      • 259
      • 35
      • 24,574

      #32
      Originally posted by pistol whip
      Oh but he was a slick fighter so that automatically means he wins even though he was marginally talented at best.

      At least thats what all the knownothings in this thread are saying.
      lmao at knownothings

      Comment

      • Russian Crushin
        atheist with a gun
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Dec 2009
        • 33788
        • 1,472
        • 836
        • 46,625

        #33
        Originally posted by shadeyfizzle
        1)Because pacquiao fought at 130 Raheem at 135. Pacquiao would not fight at 135 til 6 fights later.

        2)Morales asked for the rubber match

        3)Pacquiao wanted the 130lb wbc belt held by then rival Barrera.

        4) Raheem would go on to lose his next 2 fights after Morales
        Plus who could **** on Pac now, obviously he has made the right choise and entertained everyone, so how can you complain

        Comment

        • pistol whip
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Aug 2008
          • 8645
          • 255
          • 4
          • 15,040

          #34
          Originally posted by Dominicano Soy!
          We seen Pacquiao struggle against a stationary counter puncher who doesn't clinch in Marquez. So wouldn't it be interesting to see how Pacquiao would have fared against a counter puncher, who moves around and ties his man up?


          You do realize that there is a huge diffrence in actual talent between Raheem and Marquez right?

          There are lots and lots of boxers who have a slick fighting style but that doesn't mean all of them are world beaters. **** look at all the champions in the various weight classes **** look at the PFP top 20. not to many slick boxers on their.

          Comment

          • Russian Crushin
            atheist with a gun
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Dec 2009
            • 33788
            • 1,472
            • 836
            • 46,625

            #35
            Originally posted by Dominicano Soy!
            We seen Pacquiao struggle against a stationary counter puncher who doesn't clinch in Marquez. So wouldn't it be interesting to see how Pacquiao would have fared against a counter puncher, who moves around and ties his man up?
            I dont think he beats Marquez. Marquez is a great fighter and even though Raheem moves a little more doesnt mean he is better.

            Im sure people rather see him fight Marquez then Raheem as he is the tougher challenge

            Comment

            • shadeyfizzle
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Feb 2008
              • 7448
              • 160
              • 43
              • 13,959

              #36
              Originally posted by pistol whip
              You do realize that there is a huge diffrence in actual talent between Raheem and Marquez right?

              There are lots and lots of boxers who have a slick fighting style but that doesn't mean all of them are world beaters. **** look at all the champions in the various weight classes **** look at the PFP top 20. not to many slick boxers on their.
              Not to mention the legend of Marquez himself would not be anywhere close to what it is today if the lawsuit over Pacquiao's promotional rights never sidelined him, allowing Marquez to cut in line for Pacquiao's title shot against Barrera right when Marquez was on the brink of obscurity at 126 with fans losing all interest in his combination of boring fighting style and long resume of thai cab drivers.

              Comment

              • Doctor_Tenma
                Monster
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Apr 2009
                • 33313
                • 1,327
                • 1,249
                • 58,127

                #37
                Originally posted by pistol whip
                You do realize that there is a huge diffrence in actual talent between Raheem and Marquez right?

                There are lots and lots of boxers who have a slick fighting style but that doesn't mean all of them are world beaters. **** look at all the champions in the various weight classes **** look at the PFP top 20. not to many slick boxers on their.
                Of course I do!

                But you don't think I took note of how ordinary Pacquiao looked against Solis and Cotto (When Cotto decided to move in the late rounds)? That to me was very telling. I still question how Pacquiao would have fared against Guzman, who's offensive arsenal wasn't in Marquez's league, but Guzman had the far superior hand speed, defense, footwork and he wasn't content on trading. He, unlike Marquez, would actually tie his man up. Raheem also had some of those same attributes. So I would have loved to see it...in that Pacquiao hasn't faced that kind of style. Wouldn't you?

                Comment

                • Chups
                  Banned
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • May 2004
                  • 18400
                  • 1,835
                  • 1,281
                  • 52,879

                  #38
                  Originally posted by bmoffitt18
                  thread title
                  Just rewatch Pac-vs. Clottey.............same result.

                  Comment

                  • trainhard_187
                    Jizz on my face
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • May 2007
                    • 5569
                    • 179
                    • 2
                    • 13,278

                    #39
                    Originally posted by MmuhammadM
                    zahir raheem was a higher weight class.
                    True... Raheem was a weight class above which Morales tried to accomplish but lost..

                    Pac was in a trilogy with Morales at that time when he was parked at 130.

                    That Fight Card had Morales fighting Raheen and Pac fighting at 130 I believe it was with Velaquez..

                    Why didnt Pac fight Raheem, simple it was in a higher weight class which back then moving up in weight wasnt in their interest..

                    Comment

                    • cortdawg25
                      MR. Marvelous
                      • Apr 2006
                      • 3603
                      • 126
                      • 264
                      • 10,616

                      #40
                      there is a lot of excuse being brought up in this thread. Why team pacquiao didn't even try and make a fight with raheem after he dispatched Morales?


                      why has pacquiao not fought Morales after win? Do yall realize how much of a shadow of himself that morales was in the pacquiao trilogy. and despite this slippage, he was still able to defeat pacquaio!!!! Some FOTD!!!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP