Why didnt pac ever fight zahir raheem?
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Plus who could **** on Pac now, obviously he has made the right choise and entertained everyone, so how can you complainComment
-
You do realize that there is a huge diffrence in actual talent between Raheem and Marquez right?
There are lots and lots of boxers who have a slick fighting style but that doesn't mean all of them are world beaters. **** look at all the champions in the various weight classes **** look at the PFP top 20. not to many slick boxers on their.Comment
-
I dont think he beats Marquez. Marquez is a great fighter and even though Raheem moves a little more doesnt mean he is better.
Im sure people rather see him fight Marquez then Raheem as he is the tougher challengeComment
-
Not to mention the legend of Marquez himself would not be anywhere close to what it is today if the lawsuit over Pacquiao's promotional rights never sidelined him, allowing Marquez to cut in line for Pacquiao's title shot against Barrera right when Marquez was on the brink of obscurity at 126 with fans losing all interest in his combination of boring fighting style and long resume of thai cab drivers.You do realize that there is a huge diffrence in actual talent between Raheem and Marquez right?
There are lots and lots of boxers who have a slick fighting style but that doesn't mean all of them are world beaters. **** look at all the champions in the various weight classes **** look at the PFP top 20. not to many slick boxers on their.Comment
-
Of course I do!You do realize that there is a huge diffrence in actual talent between Raheem and Marquez right?
There are lots and lots of boxers who have a slick fighting style but that doesn't mean all of them are world beaters. **** look at all the champions in the various weight classes **** look at the PFP top 20. not to many slick boxers on their.
But you don't think I took note of how ordinary Pacquiao looked against Solis and Cotto (When Cotto decided to move in the late rounds)? That to me was very telling. I still question how Pacquiao would have fared against Guzman, who's offensive arsenal wasn't in Marquez's league, but Guzman had the far superior hand speed, defense, footwork and he wasn't content on trading. He, unlike Marquez, would actually tie his man up. Raheem also had some of those same attributes. So I would have loved to see it...in that Pacquiao hasn't faced that kind of style. Wouldn't you?Comment
-
True... Raheem was a weight class above which Morales tried to accomplish but lost..
Pac was in a trilogy with Morales at that time when he was parked at 130.
That Fight Card had Morales fighting Raheen and Pac fighting at 130 I believe it was with Velaquez..
Why didnt Pac fight Raheem, simple it was in a higher weight class which back then moving up in weight wasnt in their interest..Comment
-
there is a lot of excuse being brought up in this thread. Why team pacquiao didn't even try and make a fight with raheem after he dispatched Morales?
why has pacquiao not fought Morales after win? Do yall realize how much of a shadow of himself that morales was in the pacquiao trilogy. and despite this slippage, he was still able to defeat pacquaio!!!! Some FOTD!!!Comment
Jizz on my face
Comment