Zahir Raheem (the guy that beat Morales)... was actually a really good fighter!!

[Mr. Ryan]

I thought they screwed him bad in Houston against Rocky Juarez. They took every possible infractioned (real or imagined) and penalized him. If you take away the bogus deductions, he should have gotten the decision.

The Freitas fight really ruined his marketability, however. He had a great opportunity to pick up a belt against a fighter who was not the same since the Corrales fight and froze. Not only did he lose but he turned off American TV to his career for good.

The fight with Funeka really just sealed the deal.

[shadeyfizzle]

check your facts fool...judah was not part of that olympic team because he was beaten and eliminated by david diaz for the slot. so is it also fair to say that david diaz an olympian, who was easily ko'd by pac, is really a good fighter? and take note diaz actually won a title...something raheem never did.

damn. beat me to it. lol

[Kagami Taiga]

the fact is the guy was a good fighter, easily b level. **** pac was once b level as well, he was at the time where a raheem fight would have made sense imo.

raheem has 3 losses, only one was legit and that was to funeka, a very good fighter that i think anyone would have a hard time beating, including pac.

[Mr. Ryan]

the fact is the guy was a good fighter, easily b level. **** pac was once b level as well, he was at the time where a raheem fight would have made sense imo.

raheem has 3 losses, only one was legit and that was to funeka, a very good fighter that i think anyone would have a hard time beating, including pac.

Wasn't Pacquiao in the top 5-6 of Ring Magazine's P4P list? I wouldn't say that would make him a B-Level fighter.

[#1Assassin]

Funeka was 6'1 to Raheem 5'6 (plus he had a 3 inch reach disadvantage) against a puncher. Styles make fights man and in this case you got to give him credit for facing a bigger guy.

i agree.

its a hearns leonard type of matchup. leonard and benitez could never outbox hears cuz it would make them have to move in and out which hearns was simply too fast, skilled and smart to allow not to mention he could turn the lights out if he landed flush.

the diffrence is ray could ****, raheem couldnt. and ray could take most of hearns' shots, not his very best shot but a good shot. which raheem at that stage of his career clearly didnt.

funeka is no hearns, and raheem is no leonard, but the stylistic matchup is the same. styles make fights, seems u have to remind ppl of that on a regular on this site.

[Kagami Taiga]

Wasn't Pacquiao in the top 5-6 of Ring Magazine's P4P list? I wouldn't say that would make him a B-Level fighter.

to 5 or 6 on a p4p list is about a b level fighter imo. who's at 5 rite now?? donaire is number 3 and that dude is def. b level to me. try again...

[dannnnn]

to 5 or 6 on a p4p list is about a b level fighter imo. who's at 5 rite now?? donaire is number 3 and that dude is def. b level to me. try again...

Try what again? Try to make you look foolish? You're doing an excellent job on your own.

[Kagami Taiga]

Try what again? Try to make you look foolish? You're doing an excellent job on your own.

oh so i cant have my own opinion about mythical opinionated p4p list???riiiite...u make no sense. come back with a vaild argument that goes beyond attacking for no apparent reason.

[Easy-E]

Enter Ali Funeka...

[| THE KING |]

to 5 or 6 on a p4p list is about a b level fighter imo. who's at 5 rite now?? donaire is number 3 and that dude is def. b level to me. try again...

So there are b level fighters on a list of the worlds TOP 5 fighters?