Misconceptions made by casual fans.

[Drunk Punch]

13. Anyone who thought Vitali beat Lennox. Watch it again, he may have won 2 rounds at best.

[mrpain81]

They have no concept of weight classes. They will ask you "Why doesn't DLH fight the prince/Morales/Barrera?"

[SuckaPunch]

this is a true story. while on the train, i heard two casual fans talking about the recent aftermath of tyson vs lewis and one of them was so sure that tyson threw the fight for more money on the side.

[mrpain81]

Yeah a lot of casuals think every fight is fixed if the guy they thought would win losses, Mexican national casuals say that **** a lot. One guy was telling me that DLH sold the fight against Pac to make more money in the rematch, he was trying to tell me that Manny's punchers weren't even that hard.

I just shook my head and laughed, no need arguing with ******s.

[ModernTalking]

*****s actually believe that Floyd retired because he has nothing left to proof.

[prtyboybladeage]

Actually the best way I find to see who is a real boxing fan or casual is ask them who would win in a fight between Mayweather and Pacquiao.

A person who doesn't **** about boxing is going to Pacquiao almost every time. Even if they know a little something about boxing, they pick Pac. Then you ask them, well break it down for me and tell me exactly why Pac would win. They say something like "because is hits hard and is fast" .. at that point I laugh and just say..."ok". No point in arguing with someone who thinks that is the reason anyone would win a fight.

[Forza]

Most casuals I met don't even know about pac or floyd. They're still on that RJJ and mike tyson **** like this is the 90s.

They think anyone who gets a K.O is good or hits hard. They think guys like ali would beat every modern HW boxer in 10 seconds of rd 1...

[ModernTalking]

Actually the best way I find to see who is a real boxing fan or casual is ask them who would win in a fight between Mayweather and Pacquiao.

A person who doesn't **** about boxing is going to Pacquiao almost every time. Even if they know a little something about boxing, they pick Pac. Then you ask them, well break it down for me and tell me exactly why Pac would win. They say something like "because is hits hard and is fast" .. at that point I laugh and just say..."ok". No point in arguing with someone who thinks that is the reason anyone would win a fight.

Pac would win because he's the FIGHTER OF THE DECADE and Floyd is not the fighter of the decade.

[brick wall]

Can anyone think of more?

casual fans trying to pretend or present themselves as true or knowledgeable boxing fans. those who like to use the "you're not a true boxing fan" as an argument just because they're familiar with the topic but in reality they don't know any better as far as boxing in general is concerned.

[extracurRICular]

Actually the best way I find to see who is a real boxing fan or casual is ask them who would win in a fight between Mayweather and Pacquiao.

A person who doesn't **** about boxing is going to Pacquiao almost every time. Even if they know a little something about boxing, they pick Pac. Then you ask them, well break it down for me and tell me exactly why Pac would win. They say something like "because is hits hard and is fast" .. at that point I laugh and just say..."ok". No point in arguing with someone who thinks that is the reason anyone would win a fight.

ok thread started to be pretty good....but now it's getting a bit ******.......come on now......