Urine TKOs blood in Nevada boxing drug testing debate
Collapse
-
-
Uh?? don't u know that 95% fights in boxing don't do PPV's.?? So i'm guessing those 95% of fights that don't make money don't have to be fair?? Tygart seems fine with it.Comment
-
It would be too expensive to do so for every fights, but at the same time they really haven't showing any effort of changing their testing procedures. Like the old saying, "if it ain't broke, why fix it. But that's not the case, everything has flaws, cons and pros. But when you really compare the two agencies, it's not hard to say which is more efficient.Comment
-
She asked Tygart if blood testing is "the gold standard for everything."
"You have to collect both," an exasperated Tygart said.
Although it was noted that blood testing has caught merely one HGH cheater (a British rugby player) in eight years, Tygart said "in the next few months" a reliable blood test will be available which can nab HGH uses 14 to 21 days after usage.Comment
-
tygart is in a bad spot for the booboo he made of NOT taking blood 18days prior. assuming floyd or shane took drugs after the last blood test, then the USADA indirectly admits that urine testing below 18days will suffice, plus the post fight test.
OR, assuming still floyd or shane took drugs after the last blood test, and if the POST fight blood test showed something irregular, then still the USADA would be in a bind for not being able to detect it pre-fight and would be blamed for stopping to take blood tests 18days into the fight.Comment
-
Vic Conte said EPO would be very benfiacial to a boxer...........and it's not that they didn't catch Shane.........the NSAC does not even test for EPO or HGH. So whilst a urine test is sufficient in detecting EPO----> they don't even test for it...........!!!!!Comment
-
It would be too expensive to do so for every fights, but at the same time they really haven't showing any effort of changing their testing procedures. Like the old saying, "if it ain't broke, why fix it. But that's not the case, everything has flaws, cons and pros. But when you really compare the two agencies, it's not hard to say which is more efficient.Comment
-
just posted this son.. Anyways tygart strikes me as a money grabbing ****. he talking about a they can get the fees from a cut from PPV buys. LOL so how about non PPV fights?? no testing then?? this ****er just want's to get a cut from the biggest PPV fight in the history of boxing. **** this scum.
USADA is a non-profit organisation............just thought i would point that out.Comment
Comment