Top 100 ATG's

[JAB5239]

Because it appears he was referring to me.

It also appears he responded back to me about the TS list. Go figure.

[Bhopreign]

An all time p4p list using today's fighters would have more credence because we're "living in this day and time"? Ok. Post that than.

How far are we going back? And its ATG or pound for pound? Since many dont like to include heavys in their pound for pound.

[Toney Loc]

This list is somewhat similar to Bert Sugar list that he did a few years ago.

I was about to say that.

Ch@mp copy and pasted Bert's list, mixed them up and moved the Puerto Ricans higher.

[JAB5239]

iv read many of his posts and this is the feeling i get when i read them, im not alone on it either

Just to clarify, are you talking about Bhopreign or the TS?

[JAB5239]

How far are we going back? And its ATG or pound for pound? Since many dont like to include heavys in their pound for pound.

P4p. Lets say 1960, that sounds reasonable.

[check hook]

These list are a load of ****e for the most part......i prefer a head to head list......or fantasy fight list where you dissect who would win and why.......


but i def agree with sweet pea > JCC...


George Foreman and Tyson are too low aswell

[Bhopreign]

P4p. Lets say 1960, that sounds reasonable.

I said todays fighters, I wasnt around in 1960, dont know everything that was going on during those times and it would be ****** for me to act like I do. Look, as much as you argue back and forth about Floyd with people on this board who are present during the time, imagine say someone 80 years from now said in their opinion Floyd was the greatest thing since sliced bread, you having been around during his era would surely object, same goes for anyone not being around during the time periods of the fighters on that list.

[JAB5239]

These list are a load of ****e for the most part......i prefer a head to head list......or fantasy fight list where you dissect who would win and why.......


but i def agree with sweet pea > JCC...


George Foreman and Tyson are too low aswell

Your opinion is fine but I disagree. To many intangibles to consider in a fantasy fight determining greatness. Actual comp is the best way to make this determination, but different strokes and all.

[JAB5239]

I said todays fighters, I wasnt around in 1960, dont know everything that was going on during those times and it would be ****** for me to act like I do. Look, as much as you argue back and forth about Floyd with people on this board who are present during the time, imagine say someone 80 years from now said in their opinion Floyd was the greatest thing since sliced bread, you having been around during his era would surely object, same goes for anyone not being around during the time periods of the fighters on that list.

How about 1970? You asked how far back, Im just answering. ****, just do the last 20 years, that should be simple enough for you.

[Bhopreign]

How about 1970? You asked how far back, Im just answering. ****, just do the last 20 years, that should be simple enough for you.

I also said today's fighters, I wasnt around in 1970 either.