Floyd's DEFENCE is WAY better than PERNELL WHITTAKERS!!!!

[Bubba Chunday]

Whitaer fought closer and clowned around more so he got hit more.
Floyd stays at range most of the time and is 100% focused on not getting hit.
Whitaker slipped, ducked, parried, blocked, squatted, danced, there was nothing he coulndt do defensively.
Floyd cant do as much, but is more effective because of his focus.

[IMDAZED]

Floyd's defence is way better. The only thing with whittaker is it LOOKS better and is PRETTIER. If you really watch him he gets TAGGED more often than lil floyd.


Dont get me wrong id rather have pernells defence becuz it looks so dam pretty and it could get you alot of bitches.



But just saying Floyd's is better BOXING wise



But if you want the girls ...... pernells is better

This is too sad for words.

[freakzilladark]

i love mayweather's defensive style but i think that Whittaker's defense is better than Floyd's and its more entertaining to watch.

[Pacquiao'd]

i love mayweather's defensive style but i think that Whittaker's defense is better than Floyd's and its more entertaining to watch.

being entertaining to watch is not better.

it comes down to whats more effective and floyds D is much more effective than sweet peas which = better

[prdachamp79]

Sweet pea was very underrated as a fighter.whitaker was better defensively than floyd.floyd uses his arms and shoulders to roll off punches.sweet pea was actually imposibble to touch.i also think he was a better fighter also.whitaker is the first one that really beat chavez in san antonio.got rob against jose luis ramirez.and loss a close fight(i thought he won) against the golden boy when delahoya was in his prime.