Floyd's DEFENCE is WAY better than PERNELL WHITTAKERS!!!!
Collapse
-
-
I dont know about that, his defence is good on the defensive, not so good when he is on the offensive.
He gets tagged by the guys who should'nt be touching him and he knows this and that state of mind puts him on the offensive and in turn exposes his not only fairly average offensive, which he can only seem to capatalise on with counter-punching, but also that 5 times out of 10 he'll get rocked.Comment
-
that's what happens when you're fighting julio cesar chavez , buddy mcgirt , azumah nelson instead of the carlos baldomir's and arturo gatti's of the world.Floyd's defence is way better. The only thing with whittaker is it LOOKS better and is PRETTIER. If you really watch him he gets TAGGED more often than lil floyd.
Dont get me wrong id rather have pernells defence becuz it looks so dam pretty and it could get you alot of bitches.
But just saying Floyd's is better BOXING wise
But if you want the girls ...... pernells is betterComment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
I'm sure it has already been said(I wasn't going to read through all these threads), but Sweat Pea had better defense. Floyds D is more effective though because it sets up everything on offense. Pea's D can win him fights but Floyds D that sets up his O is more likely to score the victory. I'll take two positives over one. IMO, this is what sets Floyd apart when you compare him to defensive wizards like Pep and Whittaker.Comment
-
its like some apple and oranges kinda thing...
they are both excellent in defense though they employ it very differently...
PBF is more fundamental but PEA is more flashy...
and this "better" thing is ultimately judged by the quality of foes the fighter has faced...Comment
Comment