Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Floyd's DEFENCE is WAY better than PERNELL WHITTAKERS!!!!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Anybody can look good against little fat old men, sweet pea was fighting and looking good against ATG fighters.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Don Johnson View Post
      Anybody can look good against little fat old men, sweet pea was fighting and looking good against ATG fighters.
      So Floyd had 41 fights vs. fat Old men?

      Um okey dokey.

      Comment


      • Exacto........

        HEY MAN. GOD-FR33 HERE FROM MKE. You are getting GREEN for this post! That's exactly what I said when I posted my response. These are kids who could possibly think MAYWEATHER's defense is better than WHITAKER's. WHITAKER is not only the greatest defensive fighter ever, he is also a boxing GOD. He's in my top 5 of all-times, up there with LEONARD and ALI. Chevk out my post on this thread and tell me what you think. Hopefully I deserve GREEN for it because the majority on here are NUTS and to young to be starting threads.

        Comment


        • ^^^ No way in hell is Pernell top 5 All-Time...

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Don Johnson View Post
            Anybody can look good against little fat old men, sweet pea was fighting and looking good against ATG fighters.
            So Shane is fat now?

            Look I agree that Pernell had the better defence but don't make **** up...

            Comment


            • He's not?

              WHO'S IN YOUR TOP 5 OF ALL-TIME THEN? Name 3 fighters that came before him/since him that would have beaten him?

              Comment


              • As far as changing the fight I think floyd's defense is better because he makes you miss then makes you pay for it, whitaker just makes you miss. Floyd's defense breaks your will because not only do you miss he tags you back and makes you second guess your self when you throw punches. Whitaker's usually just makes you miss and look dumb but doesnt cut down on your workrate as much as floyd's does.

                You cant really compare competitions of different eras. There are a bunch of different scenarios that could be going on. For example hagler, leonard, hearns, and duran could of all just been around the same level while floyd is above and beyond his competition. Or floyd could just be average compared to them but we will never know, EVEN THOUGH I DONT BELIEVE THAT.
                You cant be mad at floyd you need to be mad at the competition that hasnt been able to test him yet. Maybe pacquiao will push mayweather to the limit but I doubt it.

                I see no one on his level, especially not the people that people say he ducked. Since cotto fought judah his best defense has been blocking punches with his face, floyd's best offense is hitting you in the face not a good combination. Margarito, the SLOW puncher who doesnt get started until the 6th round with no footwork, no chance at cutting the ring off from floyd. Oh and his best defensive weapon is his face(see cotto description). Paul williams who sometimes fights by throwing strong punches or fights by throwing pity pat punches, who has been put on ***** street more than ellerbe. Paul williams is the most inconsistent fighter I have ever seen. He was getting tagged in the cintron fight before cintron tried out for the olympic long jump team(I think he seriously fell out the ring I just thought that was funny).

                Scienctifically speaking as the human body evolves, it gets bigger, faster, and stronger. So that right there tells you that you can only compare fighter's of different areas relative to the competition. Because even though far as records wise and accomplishments ray robinson is the greatest, he would not do that in this era if he had the same exact abilities he had back then. There are also a bunch of other factors like athletes today have way better supplements(legal or not), advances in sports science makes direct comparisons useless.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Canadian Kid View Post
                  Floyd's defence is way better. The only thing with whittaker is it LOOKS better and is PRETTIER. If you really watch him he gets TAGGED more often than lil floyd.


                  Dont get me wrong id rather have pernells defence becuz it looks so dam pretty and it could get you alot of bitches.



                  But just saying Floyd's is better BOXING wise



                  But if you want the girls ...... pernells is better


                  Whitaker was more offensive than Mayweather.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by -EX- View Post
                    ^^^ No way in hell is Pernell top 5 All-Time...
                    According to Ring Magazines greatest 80 boxers in the last 80 years, Whittaker was number 10

                    Comment


                    • Compare the competition they faced and then get back to me who has the better defence.

                      Anyway totally different styles and stance. Sweet Pea I bet you had the better chin

                      Watch Whitaker against Santos Cardona and Julio Ceasar Vazquez which were late in his career
                      Last edited by TOBYLEE1; 06-01-2010, 06:59 AM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP