Completely different styles of defense, hard to compare the two.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Floyd's DEFENCE is WAY better than PERNELL WHITTAKERS!!!!
Collapse
-
In terms of effectiveness I think Floyd's is better because he puts himself in great positions to counter also. Pernell was an expert at making you miss but he didnt follow up like Mayweather does. Pernell used to make you miss when jab you or hit you to the body, Wheras Floyd counters with power shots because the shoulder roll is excellent for coming back with a right hand.
I think Floyd's is better. His defence and accuracy are second to none...
Comment
-
Originally posted by JK1700 View PostIn terms of effectiveness I think Floyd's is better because he puts himself in great positions to counter also. Pernell was an expert at making you miss but he didnt follow up like Mayweather does. Pernell used to make you miss when jab you or hit you to the body, Wheras Floyd counters with power shots because the shoulder roll is excellent for coming back with a right hand.
I think Floyd's is better. His defence and accuracy are second to none...
But like i said. Pernells defence could get him alot of ass
Comment
-
-
-
Based on what???
For you guys who say that MAYWEATHER is a better defensive fighter than WHITAKER, HOW LONG HAVE YOU GUYS BEEN WATCHING BOXING? WHITAKER is the greatest defensive fighter EVER! PERIOD! WILLIE PEP is number 2, and MAYWEATHER is 3rd. WHITAKER was a boxing GOD and in my top 5 to ever lace up gloves. Would MAYWEATHER look this GOOD had he been fighting fighters in their primes? I DON'T THINK SO. IT was hard to hit WHITAKER anywhere. HEAD and BODY. He had BILLION-DOLLAR LEGS, whereas MAYWEATHER doesn't have the ebst legs. Never did. That's WHY it's easy to hit him to the body. He is also suceptable to a GOOD jab. He was quicker than WHITAKER, but WHITAKER was far the overall better fighter. He never LOSS once in his PRIME. You can't say that about MAYWEATHER because he hasn't fought A-LEVEL competition. It's like those who even mention KOBE BRYANT and MICHAEL JORDAN in the same sentence. THERE IS NO COMPARISON, and that's a whole nother conversation. I'M GOD-FR33 FROM MKE by the way.
Comment
-
Originally posted by GOD-FR33 View PostFor you guys who say that MAYWEATHER is a better defensive fighter than WHITAKER, HOW LONG HAVE YOU GUYS BEEN WATCHING BOXING? WHITAKER is the greatest defensive fighter EVER! PERIOD! WILLIE PEP is number 2, and MAYWEATHER is 3rd. WHITAKER was a boxing GOD and in my top 5 to ever lace up gloves. Would MAYWEATHER look this GOOD had he been fighting fighters in their primes? I DON'T THINK SO. IT was hard to hit WHITAKER anywhere. HEAD and BODY. He had BILLION-DOLLAR LEGS, whereas MAYWEATHER doesn't have the ebst legs. Never did. That's WHY it's easy to hit him to the body. He is also suceptable to a GOOD jab. He was quicker than WHITAKER, but WHITAKER was far the overall better fighter. He never LOSS once in his PRIME. You can't say that about MAYWEATHER because he hasn't fought A-LEVEL competition. It's like those who even mention KOBE BRYANT and MICHAEL JORDAN in the same sentence. THERE IS NO COMPARISON, and that's a whole nother conversation. I'M GOD-FR33 FROM MKE by the way.
**** man nobody will take you seriously unless you get your post count up
Pernells defence LOOKS better but thats it. Fk u for saying i dont watch boxing. I take 5 hours of my day just watching boxing. Seriously. Why you think I DONT WORK? I love boxing
Comment
Comment