Why Aren't The Klitschko Brothers On The Ring's Pound For Pound List?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • B.U.R.N.E.R
    ~NSB Legend 2005-2015~
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Feb 2010
    • 30186
    • 1,344
    • 400
    • 47,475

    #21
    You Klits dudes are ****ing worse than Al Sharpton.

    Comment

    • Jim Jeffries
      rugged individualist
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Oct 2007
      • 20741
      • 1,376
      • 2,868
      • 54,838

      #22
      Partly because of HWs have traditionally not fared well on p4p lists, partly because they're so fricken huge and partly because the division is not at it's best right now.

      Comment

      • jrosales13
        undisputed champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Sep 2008
        • 32632
        • 738
        • 763
        • 40,023

        #23
        What is the true definition of P4P?

        Then tell me what advantage to the Klitschko have for the majority of their fighters?

        And, then after answering those two questions. Ask yourself are the K bros elite P4P material?

        Comment

        • Guest
          • 0
          • 0
          • 0

          #24
          Originally posted by jrosales13
          What is the true definition of P4P?

          Then tell me what advantage to the Klitschko have for the majority of their fighters?

          And, then after answering those two questions. Ask yourself are the K bros elite P4P material?

          I think they are.

          They haven't lost in forever and just dominate everyone.

          Comment

          • Dick Buffman
            Banned
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Jan 2010
            • 10401
            • 347
            • 205
            • 12,377

            #25
            Originally posted by jrosales13
            What is the true definition of P4P?

            Then tell me what advantage to the Klitschko have for the majority of their fighters?

            And, then after answering those two questions. Ask yourself are the K bros elite P4P material?
            They're better than all of them.

            And yes, they are.

            Comment

            • BillyBoxing
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Apr 2009
              • 7449
              • 488
              • 61
              • 50,228

              #26
              Originally posted by pelonxsoldier28
              You said it all right there, they're fighting bums, but that's all that are there. And no it's not their fault, but that's the reason they're not on the P4P list, and rightfully so.
              I totally disagree,Eddy Chambers isn't a bum.
              And still get dominated easily.Where you calling Eddy a bum after the Dimitrenko win,and before the Wlad fight??
              All of a sudden,he get dominated badly,so he's bum.NOOOO!
              RIGHT NOW,W KLIT IS JUST THAT GOOD.

              Too small? 6.2 isn't that small for a HW.

              Wlad is a freak of speed and skills for his own size,a gold medalist,he's a great talent.

              Bradley isn't fighting better P4P fighters,Peterson and Holt aren't good fighters,and still,Bradley struggled with freakin shot Holt.

              Comment

              • Dick Buffman
                Banned
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Jan 2010
                • 10401
                • 347
                • 205
                • 12,377

                #27
                Originally posted by jreckoning
                I think they are.

                They haven't lost in forever and just dominate everyone.
                key word.... they just don't win, its not even close.

                Thats talent.

                Michael Grant, Lance Whitaker, Valuev and even Lennox Lewis didn't dominate fighters like they do.

                So you can shove that "they're bigger" excuse straight up your collective asses.

                Comment

                • jrosales13
                  undisputed champion
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Sep 2008
                  • 32632
                  • 738
                  • 763
                  • 40,023

                  #28
                  Originally posted by jreckoning
                  I think they are.

                  They haven't lost in forever and just dominate everyone.
                  But, will they be winning if they were the same height, same reach, same weight, same size as their opponent?

                  That what P4P means.

                  The only reason why I would favor Wlad to beat Haye would be cuz of the size advantage that Wlad has. But, if everything was equal in terms of size (height, reach, weight, etc) I would favor Haye to beat them.

                  I would favor Calderon, Moreno, even Poonsawat to beat them. If everything was equal.

                  That is the true definition of P4P.

                  Comment

                  • steeluv
                    Interim Champion
                    • Jul 2009
                    • 969
                    • 39
                    • 76
                    • 7,167

                    #29
                    Cus they are both in a crap division and still both managed to get losses to bums

                    Comment

                    • jrosales13
                      undisputed champion
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Sep 2008
                      • 32632
                      • 738
                      • 763
                      • 40,023

                      #30
                      Originally posted by Jack Burton
                      They're better than all of them.

                      And yes, they are.
                      No Jack, no....

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP