The P4P list is not how dominate someone is in their division- if this was the case, they'd be up there. It's a list where you take one guy and compare him to another as if the two were the same exact size.
For example, if Sugar Shane Mosley was the same exact size as Vitali, or if Vitali was the same size as Mosley, who would win? I just don't see too many cases where, if the Klitschokos were the same size as any of the opponents on the P4P list, that they'd be able to win. Take the Mosley comparison: even the 38 year old Mosley that just fought would probably still out-punch Vitali, could handle Vitali's power (since they're at the same weight), or at the very least have more movement than Vitali to be able to move away from VK's power punches.
This philosophy does limit the number of heavyweights that will appear on P4P lists because, let's face it, heavies just don't have the moment and punch output that smaller guys have. It's easy to picture a smaller guy as being a bigger version of himself, but it's a lot harder to picture how a big fighter would fight as a smaller version of himself.
For example, if Sugar Shane Mosley was the same exact size as Vitali, or if Vitali was the same size as Mosley, who would win? I just don't see too many cases where, if the Klitschokos were the same size as any of the opponents on the P4P list, that they'd be able to win. Take the Mosley comparison: even the 38 year old Mosley that just fought would probably still out-punch Vitali, could handle Vitali's power (since they're at the same weight), or at the very least have more movement than Vitali to be able to move away from VK's power punches.
This philosophy does limit the number of heavyweights that will appear on P4P lists because, let's face it, heavies just don't have the moment and punch output that smaller guys have. It's easy to picture a smaller guy as being a bigger version of himself, but it's a lot harder to picture how a big fighter would fight as a smaller version of himself.
Comment