Floyd HAS NEVER BEATEN a BONA FIDE GREAT FIGHTER in their PRIME

[Frank Ducketts]

Barrera was done and unmotivated before he fought Pac- more excuses... so why did he beat paulie ayala the lineal and top featherweight in the world right after pac massacred him? ill tell you why because he wasnt done and the whole umotivated line is nothing but BS EXCUSE.. just another time honored ***** move JMM lost to pac TWICE its official

after u spew some BS u gonna type name for name like u know boxing now? RIGHTTTT your post should not be taken seriously not just to boxing fans but anyone who is reading it

Paulie Ayala was never a true fw, and was never the best fw in the world at any time lol... A past prime Morales beat the tar out of Pac and that let me know that had PAc faced either man in their absolute prime, they would've given PAc hell.

[feefiflofum]

You guys are hypocrites for this reason. You say I'm discrediting old fighters yet you talk about how Floyd never beat a prime h.o.f lol, and I'm the Floyd **** lover??? Then you guys bring up one fighter for PAc in Barrera who true fans knew was a fight away from being old, and was already past it. Can anyone saaaaaaaaaaay hypocrite...

,] no1 is disrediting no1 here... IN ORDER TO DISCREDIT.. you have to make up some undeserving comments after someone gets a credit for something, im pretty sure floyd hasnt been regarded as someone who beats HOF PRIM FIGHTERS..to the point of the thread.. MAY HAS NOT FOUGHT AN HOF PRIME FIGHTER.. does it look like discrediting to you? LOL not to me, its called the truth dude and something that's eating you on the inside too ****ing bad go drink your gatorade NO THINKING LOL

well im oout 4 reals i will be getting ready to watch the UFC LOL \

[feefiflofum]

Paulie Ayala was never a true fw, and was never the best fw in the world at any time lol... A past prime Morales beat the tar out of Pac and that let me know that had PAc faced either man in their absolute prime, they would've given PAc hell.

because he came from bantamweight? just like MAB did right?? or erik.. or PAC LOL.. oh yah all of those fighters came from there and made their name in the higher weights by being champs there.. ERIK.. MAB AND PAULIE all the same..ill throw u a bone.. floyd is not a real welterweight because he fought at lightweight and ammass most of his wins there...see ur spewing more paradox bs go look it up and learn from your mistake..u have no idea wat ur talking about and it really doesnt help wat ur getting at because ur spewing garbage bye

[Frank Ducketts]

,] no1 is disrediting no1 here... IN ORDER TO DISCREDIT.. you have to make up some undeserving comments after someone gets a credit for something, im pretty sure floyd hasnt been regarded as someone who beats HOF PRIM FIGHTERS..to the point of the thread.. MAY HAS NOT FOUGHT AN HOF PRIME FIGHTER.. does it look like discrediting to you? LOL not to me, its called the truth dude and something that's eating you on the inside too ****ing bad go drink your gatorade NO THINKING LOL

well im oout 4 reals i will be getting ready to watch the UFC LOL \

You ARE discrediting Floyd lol... Anyway, what is a great prime h.o.f fighter lol... Barrera was not in the h.o.f when Pac beat him. You don't get into the hall until after you retire...

[Frank Ducketts]

because he came from bantamweight? just like MAB did right?? or erik.. or PAC LOL.. oh yah all of those fighters came from there and made their name in the higher weights by being champs there.. ERIK.. MAB AND PAULIE all the same..ill throw u a bone.. floyd is not a real welterweight because he fought at lightweight and ammass most of his wins there...see ur spewing more paradox bs go look it up and learn from your mistake..u have no idea wat ur talking about and it really doesnt help wat ur getting at because ur spewing garbage bye

The first sentence is your answer, not mine. Paulie was a good, tough fighter, but he never showed he was ever the best fw in the world. MAB and EM showed you at one time they were the best fw's in the world. Your weak outlook is getting dismantled by the second...

[BoxerDood]

You really think Malignaggi has a chance? WOW

Did those words come out of my mouth? No. I said he could have fought better fighters at 135 and 140. Malignaggi wasn't a great fighter, but he was undefeated and slick, and he gave Cotto hell. I do think Floyd would have KO'ed him though. But do you really think Bruseles was any better? 140 wasn't a huge division outside of Floyd and Cotto, but there were decent names like N'Dou, Torres and Malignaggi (Cotto and Hatton didn't want it at the time, so I excluded them). If not for the hand problems, Paulie could have been a decent JWW. But I love how you completely ignored the part where I said Casamayor, Johnston, etc. I'd give Casamayor a fair chance against Floyd (I'd still pick Floyd to win though).

[Frank Ducketts]

The funny thing is fighting and beating h.o.f fighters who could potentially get into the hall is minute compared to how many tough fighters you beat during your career. It's rare to meat a peer who might turn out to be great also. Hell, Hagler fought Mugabi who gave him his hardest fight imo outside of Sugar, and people only remember Terry Norris knocking Mugabi out. Who is greater Hagler or Norris lol...

[BoxerDood]

he fought barerra who was p4p 3# & was on a 8 fight winning streak before pac & a 6 fight winning streak after pac. barerra didnt get knocked out by junior jones. he was disqualified because his corner came in the ring. then he got decisioned in the rematch.

Pac could have fougth soto? humberto soto? guzman? raheem? raheem was at 135 while pac was still fighting at 130. If pac fought & beat all those guys, could you even brag about them?


im even gonna defend floyd from the malignaggi remark. malignaggi? are you ****ing kidding me?


None of those boxers you just mentioned for both pac & floyd can be classified as great hall of fame fighters. NONE. casamayor was the best out of that bunch & he falls short of hall of fame.

I'll admit, you're right about Raheem. He was at 135 and he wasn't even good. However there was no excuse to why he didn't fight Guzman. He had the choice of fighting Valero, Guzman and Barrera (whom he had already beaten and was coming off of a loss. And he chose Barrera. Despite the hype, I am willing to exclude Valero, but there was no excuse for him not fighting Guzman. There was also no excuse to why he didn't fight Humberto Soto. He was coming off of an impressive win over Juarez, and the dude beat the crap out of Pacquiao's brother. That right there should have been more than enough to sign the fight. I mean if Marquez's resume before the Barrera fight was strong enough for people to hype him up (and the Barrera win wasn't impressive), then Soto's was too.

[hugh grant]

PBF is recognized as one of the best boxers in the world at the moment. He wants to be the best though, and the only way that will happen is if he fights the best. We know who that person supposedly is.

When PBF retired, the other person beat the best. PBF now has to beat the man who took over from him.
It cant get simpler than that.

[ADP02]

Pac beat a Morales who was at the end of his rope after he went up to lw and cam eback down. Barrera was done and unmotivated before he fought Pac, and did Pac really beat JMM. Pac beat Diaz and not Campbell at lw, beat Hatton and Dlh after Floyd, asked Cotto to fight him at 145, and he beat Clottey who is an Arum fighter.

Name for name, resume to resume, Floyd's resume is better than Pacs. Floyd is the bigger ppv draw, and Floyd is the better fighter. Where JMM gave Pac hell, floyd beat JMM easy. It's not even a contest as to who is the greater fighter. Pac has names, no substance, Floyd has substance, and his record is his proof lol...

Pac fought Marquez at Marquez's ideal weight. Those were fair matches. Floyd fight against Marquez was a disgrace! Floyd even came in over the initially agreed weight. Not a good comparison, if you ask me.