Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Who had more power? Naseem Hamed or Edwin Valero?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by The Noose View Post
    Hamed fought at world class level for most of his career. He was FW champ for 6 years.
    There is a big difference in quality of their opponents.
    you mean there's a big difference in quality of opponents between kevin kelley , manuel medina , wayne mccullough compared to vicente mosquera?

    Comment


    • #42
      Valero's mystique is based on his knockout ratio.Vitali Klitshko has a great KO ratio and yet he isn't even the hardest puncher in his own family.

      Hamed fought and knocked out top opposition.He fought and knocked out rated contenders and other champions.The first opponent that Valero fought of class and his power simply wasn't there.


      Valero had talent but he was never the puncher he was made out to be.




      Originally posted by Left Hook Tua View Post
      you mean there's a big difference in quality of opponents between kevin kelley , manuel medina , wayne mccullough compared to vicente mosquera?


      Vuyani Bungu,Paul Ingle,Cesar Soto,Wilfredo Vazquez,Tom Johnson,Steve Robinson.




      There's alot of revisionist history regarding Hamed's resume and who he actually fought and beat.
      Last edited by Bright-Eyes; 05-28-2010, 02:38 AM.

      Comment


      • #43
        Hamed, he fought top fighters and contenders.

        Comment


        • #44
          Hamed easily, he also proved his power against better opposistion than Valero.

          Comment

          Working...
          X
          TOP