Because with Hatton and ODLH (for the last time) he didn't have any leverage to demand more money, which is why he didn't have financial issues in previous negotiations. It's only now that he has this type of leverage, but it's overblown (Power corrupts; absolute power corrupts absolutely) and that is my "main" point. I wouldn't have an issue with something like a 52/48 split because there isn't that much of a disparity between their numbers, but it appears to me as if he is throwing up roadblocks simply to throw his weight around.
Comments Thread For: Team Pacquiao: Floyd Mayweather Demands More Money
Collapse
-
-
Because with Hatton and ODLH (for the last time) he didn't have any leverage to demand more money, which is why he didn't have financial issues in previous negotiations. He has got some leverage now, but it's overblown and that is my "main" point. I wouldn't have an issue with something like a 52/48 split because there isn't that much of a disparity between their numbers, but it appears to me as if he is throwing up roadblocks simply to throw his weight around.Comment
-
Yea right. Get back to me when you figure that one out. Matter fact let me know when your in the city again and I'll take you right to Meth and Red if you can stand the smell of really good weed. Not my thang so I don't hang often.Comment
-
Park Hill area, Staten Island. Take me to see Nas in Queens and you got a deal. Sugar I would take you up on the weed thing, but I've never tried a drug in my life besides a redline energy drink and bottled water.Last edited by switchsouthpaw; 05-27-2010, 02:27 PM.Comment
-
Yes I know he made more money than Ricky, because Ricky brought more money to the table, due to the television distribution rights he had in Europe, with anyone else at the time he wouldn't have made that kind of money and that's my point, who else besides Ricky would bring him international exposure...the kind of exposure that makes economic sense.Last edited by switchsouthpaw; 05-27-2010, 02:26 PM.Comment
-
Yes I know he made more money than Ricky, because Ricky brought more money to the table, due to the television distribution rights he had in Europe, with anyone else at the time he wouldn't have made that kind of money and that's my point, who else besides Ricky would bring him international exposure...the kind of exposure that makes economic sense.
Got it.
Comment
-
Right of course it's over your head. Ricky brought value to the table because of international television distribution rights (know what that is?), they both stood to make that much more facing each other, than facing anyone else. Doesn't matter who made more, because in context Ricky made more than he ever had prior and that's the point.Last edited by switchsouthpaw; 05-27-2010, 02:39 PM.Comment
-
Listen dude. The bottom line is this: Floyd Mayweather has never had an issue negotiating finances for a fight up until the Pacquiao fight. The same cannot be said for Manny, who had issues with both Oscar and Hatton. The same applied to Floyd but there was no problem. And telling me what Hatton brought to the table is irrelevant because he brought the same things to the table against Manny as well. End of story.Comment
-
Listen dude. The bottom line is this: Floyd Mayweather has never had an issue negotiating finances for a fight up until the Pacquiao fight. The same cannot be said for Manny, who had issues with both Oscar and Hatton. The same applied to Floyd but there was no problem. And telling me what Hatton brought to the table is irrelevant because he brought the same things to the table against Manny as well. End of story.Comment
-
You're playing a verbal shell game. What you describe as a financial "problem", was resolved in a matter of weeks. That's being reasonable; not taking a leap year to decide what you want to do or not do, that is the definition of a "problem", as it relates to this particular negotiation it appears to me as if predefined rules aren't met...Floyd walks or if they are met, he creates another rule.Comment
Comment