Tweet
The United States Anti-Doping Agency confirmed Friday that the final blood sample taken from Shane Mosley was April 12 and the final one taken from Floyd Mayweather was April 13 as part of their agreement to undergo random, Olympic-style testing prior to their May 1 welterweight boxing match in Las Vegas.
-
The word cut off does not to be inserted in the story. The point is there was an agreement for a final blood testing 18 days before the fight. Meaning both fighters and USADA agreeing to stop at a certain date for the final blood testing, you can call that a cut off date.Last edited by loui_ludwig; 05-22-2010, 10:51 PM. -
Psst, the paragraph above was the last paragraph from Yahoo/Iole's article. This Schaefer sc*mbag has some nerves. He's going on about how great this OST thing is for the sport, yet, only one of his fighters have done it, and it doesn't appear anybody else in his stable will be going through it anytime soon.“I’m not a drug-testing expert and I’ve never put together a testing program protocol, but where there is a will, there is a way,” Schaefer said. “Our interest as promoters should be to have a clean sport. At the end of the day, this is protecting our fighters and doing something positive for the sport.Comment
-
How do you just stop reading midway In the sentence. And the whole statement.
Comment
-
part of their agreement to undergo random, Olympic-style testing prior to their May 1 welterweight boxing match in Las Vegas.
The Agreement Is the Random Olympic-Style Testing. Thats why you continue reading, Not Stop mid sentence. They're not talking about a separate agreement.
Also Read the WHOLE article:
But if you’re thinking that concession will lead to Mayweather vs. Pacquiao on Nov. 13, slow down. There is a big difference between what Pacquiao told Giongco he’d agree to and what Mayweather and Mosley did, said Travis Tygart, the chief executive officer of USADA.
“That totally misses the point,” Tygart said of the reaction some may have upon hearing of Pacquiao’s concession and the timing of Mayweather’s last blood test. “If you know you aren’t going to be tested within the last 14 days, you can cheat and get away with it. It is our right to test at any time, 30 days before the fight, 20 days before, the week of, the morning of – that provides the deterrent. If you block out a period of time and say we can’t test during that period, then an athlete could cheat and get away with it.”
There was No cut off date.Last edited by DE100; 05-22-2010, 11:06 PM.Comment
-
If your saying i need to read the whole story, then you need to post and read the paragraph that i posted.part of their agreement to undergo random, Olympic-style testing prior to their May 1 welterweight boxing match in Las Vegas.
The Agreement Is the Random Olympic-Style Testing. Thats why you continue reading, Not Stop mid sentence. They're not talking about a separate agreement.
Also Read the WHOLE article:
But if you’re thinking that concession will lead to Mayweather vs. Pacquiao on Nov. 13, slow down. There is a big difference between what Pacquiao told Giongco he’d agree to and what Mayweather and Mosley did, said Travis Tygart, the chief executive officer of USADA.
“That totally misses the point,” Tygart said of the reaction some may have upon hearing of Pacquiao’s concession and the timing of Mayweather’s last blood test. “If you know you aren’t going to be tested within the last 14 days, you can cheat and get away with it. It is our right to test at any time, 30 days before the fight, 20 days before, the week of, the morning of – that provides the deterrent. If you block out a period of time and say we can’t test during that period, then an athlete could cheat and get away with it.”
There was No cut off date.
Key words are "part of their agreement".Comment
Comment