Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Floyd Fans, enough of the “Pac ducked Mosley”.

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by GT-R View Post
    Pac fought and TKO’d Cotto; the man who boxed the **** out of Mosley. This is the same concept as Pac fighting Mosley after Floyd beat him. Winners need to fight winners. IMO Pac-Marg is another bull**** arum is offering us. Unless Mosley rematches Cotto and beats him convincingly, he shouldn’t get a shot at Pac.
    I stopped there.

    Comment


    • #12
      If manny fought shane instead of cotto, we'd be hearing people cry about manny ducking a game young cotto and how he cherry picked a 38 yr. old shot fighter.. oh wait..

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by GT-R View Post
        wasnt there a time when the thought of Pacquiao fighting cotto and coming to the WW was a joke? those were the times my friend and when pac finally stepped up to the WWs, yall try the hardest to belittle pac and his opponents.

        DLH = drained
        Cotto = shot
        Clottey = tailor made
        Again GTR, you brought this on yourself, by trying to discredit Mayweather by saying Mosley was just the leftovers of Cotto who Pcc beat, you opened the door for anyone to use the same logic and make the same claim about Cotto/Clottey/Hatton/DLH.

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by Michael Hall View Post
          Look at the timeline my friend. Pac didn't fight Cotto IMMEDIATLEY after he narrowly survived Shane Mosley on the scorecards. He beat Cotto after Margarito beat the LIFE out of him (albeit illegally).

          After Margarito beat the spirit out of Cotto, Shane Mosley fights Margs next and OBLITERATES him in Sugar Ray Robinson type fashion.

          The OBVIOUS fight was MOSLEY-PACQUIAO.

          Instead Pac chose Cotto. LOL!

          QUACK! QUACK!
          even if we line up pac-mosley before cotto or post floyd, mosley would get a beating. i would hate to see that.

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by GT-R View Post
            wasnt there a time when the thought of Pacquiao fighting cotto and coming to the WW was a joke? those were the times my friend and when pac finally stepped up to the WWs, yall try the hardest to belittle pac and his opponents.

            DLH = drained
            Cotto = shot
            Clottey = tailor made
            i'm not belittling pac. most people on nsb already know pac is a great fighter. however, team pac did DUCK mosley. roach admitted it. shane admitted it. why can't you?

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by GT-R View Post
              even if we line up pac-mosley before cotto or post floyd, mosley would get a beating. i would hate to see that.
              that's just talk.

              fact is freddie roach believed shane at 147 was too good for pac and that's why they didn't fight. this is not "*****" drivel.

              this has already been covered and documented.

              if roach really believed pac would have ****ed mosley up then the fight would have happened.

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by AllEyesOpen View Post
                Again GTR, you brought this on yourself, by trying to discredit Mayweather by saying Mosley was just the leftovers of Cotto who Pcc beat, you opened the door for anyone to use the same logic and make the same claim about Cotto/Clottey/Hatton/DLH.
                This thread aint about discrediting Floyd, its about giving pac respect he deserves.

                dont tell me floyd aint fought old ass and past prime boxers before. let me add fattening up a LW and boxers coming off a major loss for easy victory.

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by GT-R View Post
                  Pac fought and TKO’d Cotto; the man who boxed the **** out of Mosley. This is the same concept as Pac fighting Mosley after Floyd beat him. Winners need to fight winners. IMO Pac-Marg is another bull**** arum is offering us. Unless Mosley rematches Cotto and beats him convincingly, he shouldn’t get a shot at Pac.
                  You must not seen the freddie roach interviews.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by Michael Hall View Post
                    that's just talk.

                    fact is freddie roach believed shane at 147 was too good for pac and that's why they didn't fight. this is not "*****" drivel.

                    this has already been covered and documented.

                    if roach really believed pac would have ****ed mosley up then the fight would have happened.
                    this is when pac was thought too small for the WWs. u dont jump in the water without testing it first.

                    after all these said, do you honestly think mosley has a chance against pac if it was somehow magically scheduled this year?

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by Horus View Post
                      You must not seen the freddie roach interviews.
                      i cant say i havent but i started this thread without having to think of a roach interview. its from someone saying pac duck'd mosley.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP