Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Floyd Fans, enough of the “Pac ducked Mosley”.

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Floyd Fans, enough of the “Pac ducked Mosley”.

    Pac fought and TKO’d Cotto; the man who boxed the **** out of Mosley. This is the same concept as Pac fighting Mosley after Floyd beat him. Winners need to fight winners. IMO Pac-Marg is another bull**** arum is offering us. Unless Mosley rematches Cotto and beats him convincingly, he shouldn’t get a shot at Pac.

  • #2
    That wasn't the same Cotto who outboxed Mosley.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Dominicano Soy! View Post
      That wasn't the same Cotto who outboxed Mosley.
      ok. it was miguelita angelina cotta who fought pac

      Comment


      • #4
        winners fight winners? I don't think DLH or Hatton or even Cotto(who had a lot trouble against Clottey, and destroyed by Marg) were still winners when Pacquiao fought them but that's beyond the point. It's hard to make people stop talking about the words that came from Roach's mouth.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by AllEyesOpen View Post
          winners fight winners? I don't think DLH or Hatton or even Cotto(who had a lot trouble against Clottey, and destroyed by Marg) were still winners when Pacquiao fought them but that's beyond the point. It's hard to make people stop talking about the words that came from Roach's mouth.
          DLH = exhibition money fight. his last fight was a semi-controversial win agains floyd. many believed he was robbed.
          Hatton = WTF was he supposed to do? hes the reigning 140 champ. manny challenged him. his floyd fight was at WW.
          Cotto = came off a controversial win against clottey.
          Clottey = was considered the winner against cotto. to prove once and for all, pac disposed of both

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by GT-R View Post
            DLH = exhibition money fight. his last fight was a semi-controversial win agains floyd. many believed he was robbed.
            Hatton = WTF was he supposed to do? hes the reigning 140 champ. manny challenged him. his floyd fight was at WW.
            Cotto = came off a controversial win against clottey.
            Clottey = was considered the winner against cotto. to prove once and for all, pac disposed of both
            Hey i'm not trying to discredit Pacquiao, but you claimed winners fight winners in an attempt to discredit Mosley/Mayweather. I just had to point out that all those fighters were coming off of loses in one of their last 2 fights before Pacquiao. As for the main topic in the thread, Roach said it, not Floyd fans.
            Last edited by AllEyesOpen; 05-17-2010, 12:41 PM.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by GT-R View Post
              Pac fought and TKO’d Cotto; the man who boxed the **** out of Mosley. This is the same concept as Pac fighting Mosley after Floyd beat him. Winners need to fight winners. IMO Pac-Marg is another bull**** arum is offering us. Unless Mosley rematches Cotto and beats him convincingly, he shouldn’t get a shot at Pac.
              Look at the timeline my friend. Pac didn't fight Cotto IMMEDIATLEY after he narrowly survived Shane Mosley on the scorecards. He beat Cotto after Margarito beat the LIFE out of him (albeit illegally).

              After Margarito beat the spirit out of Cotto, Shane Mosley fights Margs next and OBLITERATES him in Sugar Ray Robinson type fashion.

              The OBVIOUS fight was MOSLEY-PACQUIAO.

              Instead Pac chose Cotto. LOL!

              QUACK! QUACK!

              Comment


              • #8
                Floyd was scheduled to fight Zab when Zab lost to Baldomir. Like a real champ Floyd fights Zab and Baldomir back-to-back.

                That's what REAL BOXING CHAMPIONS do!

                Pac should have fought Cotto and Mosley. Instead he fought Cotto and Clottey.

                Now they're lining MARGARITO up for him. This is the MIGUEL COTTO scenario all over again. Margarito was DESTROYED by SSM and now Pac will fight Margs.

                LMAO!

                Floyd fans are laughing...

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by GT-R View Post
                  Pac fought and TKO’d Cotto; the man who boxed the **** out of Mosley. This is the same concept as Pac fighting Mosley after Floyd beat him. Winners need to fight winners. IMO Pac-Marg is another bull**** arum is offering us. Unless Mosley rematches Cotto and beats him convincingly, he shouldn’t get a shot at Pac.
                  Agreed man! But some posters already have their mind set. You are fighting a battle you can't win. But the war will start when pacman and floyd fight in the ring.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Michael Hall View Post
                    Look at the timeline my friend. Pac didn't fight Cotto IMMEDIATLEY after he narrowly survived Shane Mosley on the scorecards. He beat Cotto after Margarito beat the LIFE out of him (albeit illegally).

                    After Margarito beat the spirit out of Cotto, Shane Mosley fights Margs next and OBLITERATES him in Sugar Ray Robinson type fashion.

                    The OBVIOUS fight was MOSLEY-PACQUIAO.

                    Instead Pac chose Cotto. LOL!

                    QUACK! QUACK!
                    wasnt there a time when the thought of Pacquiao fighting cotto and coming to the WW was a joke? those were the times my friend and when pac finally stepped up to the WWs, yall try the hardest to belittle pac and his opponents.

                    DLH = drained
                    Cotto = shot
                    Clottey = tailor made

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP