Pac v.s ODH and PBF v.s. SSM punch stats...INTERESTING FACTS

[cixthree]

Apples and oranges dude. Way to many things come into play as to why stats happen.
1. Floyd is a boxer, he voids your chances by giving false looks and his counters cause hesitation. Which in turn lowers ur output.
Manny is all output, which lowers your output.

Oscar was 36, Mosley 38. When Floyd fought Oscar the ages were 30 Floyd, Oscar 34. Manny 29, Oscar 36. Floyd/Oscar 154, Oscar/Manny 147.

No need to play the whatt if game.

[Bacatit]

facts. but we cannot deny the fact that floyd has the ability to reduce his opponents punches. whatever you call that. outbox.

I like you kid.

[STRUGG]

Right. People don't think before they post. The TS is the same guy that made thread after thread about how Floyd was ducking Shane, AS SOON THE FIGHT WAS ON he talked about how old and out of prime Shane was. Its typical.

bitter old Mr. WEBB i see...............those numbers arent biased like any other posters here............

[fcastro1]

i definitely agree floyd was a factor.........as much as PAC was in his............................no bias there.....ODH loss a SD against floyd...and won against forbes.....shane was getting outbox by mayorga.....and gave a brilliant performance against made to order Margarito(we all know shane has great skills with regards to mexican fighting)..........mosley didnt age overnight..........he was old a long time ago......to think this is purely FLOYDS dominance is as foolish as PAC v.s. ODH.....you can try to spin it.....but you dont to choose whos old and whose not.....specially with this numbers.....black and white.....

i totally agree. shane was just as bad as delahoya yet *****s think its a better victory. *****s are incredibly biased.

[ELPacman]

Pac would of KO'd Mosley because he knows how to close the show. Something Fraud hasn't learned yet. Not to mention when Pac beats up on oldies, he really beats them up. Doesn't let them get away with a 12 UD loss. Whooptie.

[STRUGG]

just saying if you giving floyd credit for shane...............you need to give PAc as well...........................the puchstats are almost identical...............

[Hannibal Barca]

Rule #1: Don't ever reply to an hater's thread. Don't do it man. They are not open to debate they just want to try and piss you off. They know they are talking out of their ass. Let them be just the haters posting. Copy their names and paste them on to the ignore list, that's all we can do to ease the hate thread creating here. Let them create 1324232 similar threads were only other haters post on.

I second this.

[El Jesus]

sometimes i sincerely wonder.

at what point do you guys sit down...and just think about other fighters? even this weekends outcomes cant stop you from digging up something as insignifigant as this.

i feel like there is just nothing else to say until a contract is signed.

[STRUGG]

I second this.

say so the troll.....lol......

[dans]

How about this for a real stat comparison:

http://www.hbo.com/boxing/fights/2007/05-05-oscar-de-la-hoya-vs-floyd-mayweather#/boxing/fights/2007/05-05-oscar-de-la-hoya-vs-floyd-mayweather/article/analysis-compubox-post-fight.html

Mayweather held a non-zombie version of De La Hoya to 21%, while landing 57% of his shots.

Pacquiao landed 59% against Oscar (about the same), while allowing zombie De La Hoya to land 31% of his shots. If zombie Hoya can land 31% against Pac, then Floyd will land over 50% easily.