Why does Floyd have to win 7 titles to be great?
Collapse
-
-
Cmon dont ruin the thread bro. Bring something to the table. The heavy hitters are in this one.Comment
-
Well I see what you are saying. I'm not saying they are the deciding factor but they do mean alot depending on how they were earned.
e.g. beating the top guy in the division vs winning a vacant belt or beating a paper champ
How was that a terrible example. He said belts don't mean nothing but tell that to B-hop and Hagler (who prided themselves of being the MW champ and defending their titles). To be the Champ you have to have a title...which I why I brought that up to argue his statement that titles mean nothing.
I agree which is why I said I digress. IMO Diaz was atleast a top 5 LW but to me that was one of Pac's worst wins, which is why I hardly bring it up. FWIW there was no one at 140 better than Hatton when Pac beat him. Talent wise...maybe (although I can't think of anyone) but not accomplishment wise. Also Cotto was a top 147lb. Was he the best at that time, I don't think so but he did beat Clottey Zab Quintana and Mosley....making him a very Legit fighter (top 3 IMO) at 147.Comment
-
Okay..I think me and you are on the same page. I never meant they were the deciding factor but they do live mental impressions on voters. Any stat or accomplishment in any sport does. I agree there is more to it though, as seen by me bringing up DLH record against ATG's.Comment
-
Exactly. Like I said...Joe Calzaghe was in the running for that award
. Not to knock him but...you feel me?
I agree. But when you bring up Hagler (and even Hopkins), you're talking about a different era, when belts meant more. Ricky Hatton had the IBO title, for goodness sake. WTF is that? And he wasn't the best fighter at 140 either so he doesn't get a pass on that side.How was that a terrible example. He said belts don't mean nothing but tell that to B-hop and Hagler (who prided themselves of being the MW champ and defending their titles). To be the Champ you have to have a title...which I why I brought that up to argue his statement that titles mean nothing.
Anyone who saw Hatton against Lazcano knew he was finished. And could not possibly be the best. He was just the best name. It's like arguing that Pea was the best welter when Oscar beat him. Yeah, in magazines but anyone who saw him against Hurtado knew Tito and Quartey would beat his ass. Cotto was a top 147lber but not the top. Not after that beatdown form Margarito who was the top dog until he got beat down. SimpleI agree which is why I said I digress. IMO Diaz was atleast a top 5 LW but to me that was one of Pac's worst wins, which is why I hardly bring it up. FWIW there was no one at 140 better than Hatton when Pac beat him. Talent wise...maybe (although I can't think of anyone) but not accomplishment wise. Also Cotto was a top 147lb. Was he the best at that time, I don't think so but he did beat Clottey Zab Quintana and Mosley....making him a very Legit fighter (top 3 IMO) at 147.
.
Comment
-
I still remember that BS that Ray Leonard pull with Lalonde till today, Like IMDAZED said its "who you beat and when"...............Hatton beat Castillo but its when he beat him.Comment
-
Yeah we're never gonna forget that. Again I agree Pacquiao has accomplished more but "Way More?"...I don't think so.Comment
-
Titles still mean something in the sport. For guys like Pacquiao and Mayweather who are seeing much bigger checks than the dude who's 15-0 coming up looking for his first title, a title is just another trophy to hang.
Ask yourselves this, do you think Floyd is gonna throw out the showcase of titles he has in his house as if they mean nothing? Of course not...lol, they mean a lot to him because that paved the way to get where he is today. Does he need another belt now? No, he earned his spot in Boxing and is an attraction, something most fighters will never be.
He can say **** about titles now, but prior to him being a star he was all about winning the next title.Comment
-
Comment
Comment