Yet you're incapable of creating a coherent and credible rebuttal. Continue trolling, because you seem to be handicapped when it comes to the battle of wits.
This isn't the court of law. It's the court of public opinion. Innocent until proven guilty doesn't exist.
so, the reason why you suspect him is he refused non-sanctioned, not-required, test that is far more invasive than what is required of him, of a governing body of his opponent's choosing.
If its logic based on fallacies you should easily be able to form an argument against it. Do so.
Mayweather subjected himself to WADA testing methods, and went out and dominated one of the best fighters of our era. He has nothing else to prove in my eyes.
YOUR EYES...that's the keyword. Something that DON'T MATTER! That's why it's Imbecilic for MY EYES at my end.
so, the reason why you suspect him is he refused non-sanctioned, not-required, test that is far more invasive than what is required of him, of a governing body of his opponent's choosing.
right...
Yes, all the while giving multiple excuses and contradictions as to why he can't take and wont take the test. A test that isn't bothersome in the least.
Yes, all the while giving multiple excuses and contradictions as to why he can't take and wont take the test. A test that isn't bothersome in the least.
Tweet
Comment