Comments Thread For: Abraham-Froch: Switzerland May Settle The Venue Dispute

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Slick_Rick
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Feb 2010
    • 1660
    • 42
    • 9
    • 8,557

    #31
    It should be held in the Amsterdam, its easy to get to for both sets of fans and a pretty neutral place.

    Comment

    • eli porter
      Interim Champion
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • Oct 2008
      • 964
      • 61
      • 171
      • 7,253

      #32
      France, Belgium or the Netherlands. Switzerland doesn't make much sense.

      Comment

      • Shattered Jaw
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Apr 2009
        • 5131
        • 261
        • 141
        • 11,649

        #33
        Originally posted by Fairweather
        After that close fight between Kessler and Froch the first two people in the ring to get to Kessler were the Sauerlands and they were celebrating immediately even though the judges hadn't even given the verdict yet. That was a bit odd.

        If Tilleman is the same guy that officiated the Ottke vs Reid debacle I'm amazed the Froch camp didn't object.
        Well obviously they knew what was up. When you employ Tilleman you know hes going to bring disgrace to the table. Froch needs a better promoter. Hennesey has got him the right fights.... just on a terrible timescale.

        He's also a complete lightweight. He's a club promoter, not fit for the big boys such as the crass Americans Shaw and Goosen and the corrupt and slimy Sauerlands.

        Comment

        • Slick_Rick
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Feb 2010
          • 1660
          • 42
          • 9
          • 8,557

          #34
          Originally posted by eli porter
          France, Belgium or the Netherlands. Switzerland doesn't make much sense.
          France is only neutral because dislike Britain and Germany so much, thats why I said it should be held in Wales.

          Comment

          • ChopperRead
            Banned
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Mar 2009
            • 4418
            • 170
            • 125
            • 4,609

            #35
            Originally posted by Slick_Rick
            France is only neutral because dislike Britain and Germany so much, thats why I said it should be held in Wales.
            How about Slovenia? That's as neutral as it gets.

            Comment

            • Slick_Rick
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Feb 2010
              • 1660
              • 42
              • 9
              • 8,557

              #36
              Originally posted by ChopperRead
              How about Slovenia? That's as neutral as it gets.
              I don't how Slovenians regard Germans and English people, its also central europe, closer to Germany, it should be a place in-between England and Germany.

              Also isn't Abraham Armenian by birth, do they not have some loyalty to Slovenia?

              Comment

              • Clegg
                Banned
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Mar 2008
                • 24673
                • 3,726
                • 2,307
                • 233,274

                #37
                Switzerland is not neutral because, aside from sharing a land-border with Germany and being a lot closer to AA than Froch, we've seen in the past that Sauerland are happy to stage fights in Switzerland and do a good job of appointing the kind of judges that favour their boxer.

                If someone wants to claim that the UK does not have impartial officials then I've no problem with that. There have been bad decisions here and the home fighter sometimes gets preferential treatment. But the only neutral place for this fight to happen is the US. Anywhere in Europe and we are just going to get a bunch of Belgian/Dutch/French/Italian judges who will have filled out their scorecards before the fight begins, and a ref who will deduct a point from Froch everytime he lands a legit body shot.

                Comment

                • BOLLOCKS
                  Banned
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Apr 2006
                  • 36266
                  • 1,401
                  • 1,537
                  • 58,925

                  #38
                  Originally posted by Clegg
                  Switzerland is not neutral because, aside from sharing a land-border with Germany and being a lot closer to AA than Froch, we've seen in the past that Sauerland are happy to stage fights in Switzerland and do a good job of appointing the kind of judges that favour their boxer.

                  If someone wants to claim that the UK does not have impartial officials then I've no problem with that. There have been bad decisions here and the home fighter sometimes gets preferential treatment. But the only neutral place for this fight to happen is the US. Anywhere in Europe and we are just going to get a bunch of Belgian/Dutch/French/Italian judges who will have filled out their scorecards before the fight begins, and a ref who will deduct a point from Froch everytime he lands a legit body shot.
                  I agree, it should happen in California.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  TOP