Start from about page 63 and read them all the way through, where I refuted your posts and highlighted all your contradictions, with other posters joining in to point out those same inconsistencies...
Can you cite one example. Because I've read and seen NONE.
Yeah, yeah, yeah. We know Floyd has avoided some serious competition. Just like you do questions.
Ok let's rephrase the question this way;
1) If Manny agrees to random testing and because I need to be very specific with you, as you either suffer from autism or that stuff you smoke must be really good, if he agrees to random "blood" tests--all good...yes or no?
It was Pac himself who said he would allow up until 1-3 days to be tested, why the change all of a sudden?
normally id answer you but not now.. nah nah why dont you answer me then i will give you the same courtesy.. all you *****s do is jump around soo? why u changing all of a sudden.. LMAO
Can you cite one example. Because I've read and seen NONE.
Go ahead.
Well I realize you see none, blinders or denial tend to lead us in that direction. I will provide them shortly, I'm going through them now. Other posters have asked you to provide specific examples to support your posts and you offered none.
Here is a prime example...you stated that on numerous occasions that Pac had bucked the Nevada commission and their testing procedures, I along with many other posts asked you to support that comment with facts and instead you spoke in circles never once providing anything factual to support your claims, all you've managed to accomplish in this thread is a lot of "emoting", but you lack actual facts to support any of your claims.
1) If Manny agrees to random testing and because I need to be very specific with you, as you either suffer from autism or that stuff you smoke must be really good, if he agrees to random "blood" tests--all good...yes or no?
normally id answer you but not now.. nah nah why dont you answer me then i will give you the same courtesy.. all you *****s do is jump around soo? why u changing all of a sudden.. LMAO
I didnt think you would be able to answer that one.
The afraid of needles thing was offered by Arum, the person who represents Pacquiao? His trainer said the same thing.
I am afraid of needles and I got a bunch of tats. I hate it when a long ass needle enters my body probing my vains n ****. I hate it when someone pokes my veins to purposely draw out blood. You can't say **** but speculate that pac really aint afraid of needles, you can't prove ****. Why even question the man and compare injections to draw out blood with tattoos totally different types of mentality goes into getting a tat and having your blood drawn.
Second, Pacquiao told Brian Kenny he was fine with the blood test as long as it wasn't the day of or the day before the fight (citing the Morales fight). Why then did he need a THIRTY DAY cut-off? And why did he have an issue with 14 days?
Anything can change when you are negotiating. Just because he is fine with something don't mean he will do it. He will do it before the fight.
Third, Pacquiao claims he can't have his blood taken within 24 days of a fight, yet had his blood taken 19 days before the Clottey bout and went out and sparkled the next day in his sparring session. That was before throwing a dizzying 1200+ punches against Clottey.
Damn Pacquiao will do what is required. Get that through your biased thick dome. Floyds demands are not. Pac is not Floyds *****
Finally, I believe Floyd's motives are selfish. I believe Floyd avoided Margarito. I believe Floyd is all about the mighty dollar. I have Pacquiao ranked higher than Floyd all-time. But none of that changes what Pacquiao said and did. None.
I am afraid of needles and I got a bunch of tats. I hate it when a long ass needle enters my body probing my vains n ****. I hate it when someone pokes my veins to purposely draw out blood. You can't say **** but speculate that pac really aint afraid of needles, you can't prove ****. Why even question the man and compare injections to draw out blood with tattoos totally different types of mentality goes into getting a tat and having your blood drawn. I bleed all the time.
Yeah but Pac's only afraid of needles if it happens 24 days to a fight.
Can you cite one example. Because I've read and seen NONE.
Go ahead.
you lie i have many examples
by the way you lied blood test can detect EPO.. and you said i lied, you also said in my world blood test is unnecassary and the so called experts which you never cited by the way.. said its necassaryy
well ill cite you an expert whos pretty much the main guy you wanna go to when he talks about PEDS..
b
Don M. Catlin M.D, hes the guy who busted the balco pharmancy and develop the test for the clear.. and here's a conversaion he had with a reporter regarding blood test
Question:
) I've heard a lot about using both a blood and urine test to detect EPO use. Doesn't an athlete have to test positive for EPO on both the blood and urine test to be considered a doper?
No.
Blood testing has received a lot of attention because it is a new concept in the drug testing world. There is a blood test for EPO use, but it is only an indirect test that can be used as a screening measure to save money by determining whether the urine EPO test needs to be conducted. All the blood test does is tell the testers that the athlete has an unusual blood profile that warrants further investigation. The abnormal profile could be caused by the use of EPO, some other blood boosting drug, or just be explained by the athlete being a genetic freak or living at altitude. The testers then perform the urine EPO test to determine whether artificial EPO is the cause of the abnormality.
The blood test does not have to be done in order for the athlete to test positive for EPO.
am i wrong? youre either a liar or an ignoramus.. so which one r u?
assuming youre not a liar and you dunno wtf u talking about.. how dda heck u gonna talk about drug testing.. how do u know which drugs test is good and which one you want when you dont know what you want??
Comment