Comments Thread For: Mayweather-Pacquiao: Roach Has a Drug Testing Solution

[flour]

What people like you fail to realize is that Floyd didn't create the protocol the USADA uses

maybe floyd shouldnt have asked for it

So when the USADA says we are taking x amount of blood and urine tests up to the day of the fight, they are following their own orders.

your ******,if the fighters want to have a cut-off date that's fine why? because there's already an UNLIMITED URINALYSIS CLAUSE whereby they can test all PEDS except for HGH the gasser of athletes and we all know PAC does not gas, so why the b
and they ha

It doesn't strike you as odd that Pacquiao wants a cutoff date?

you and i both know,that pac has stated in 2005 the blood test he took 3 days b4 the morales fighter contributed to the overall result whereby he hrad an allout war with morales for 12 rounds and when he didnt take a blood test 7 months later, he pummelled him..

so if pac wants to have a cutoff test so it wont affect him and take away my privilege of seeing him at his best? then i am all 4 it

you lie through your gritty teef when you already know pac has a legitimated valid reason to ask for a cut-off date, this info has been out for 2 months now
youre just a typical ***** who derail threads and talk about nonesense issues of random test now when everyone including the mayweather moved on from it and as fans, we give each other ideas on how both camps can come to a reasonable compromise when it comes to blood testing

JQ is right about you *****s, youre not worth debating

the rest of your statements below are used to support your premise above and i answered it and destroyed it.. i dont need to seriously reply to it...

Or that he wanted a cap on the # of tests he was given?

Or that he was telling the USADA how to do their job yet, "doesn't even know what a steroid is?"

*****


on a side-note lets all get back to topic people and avoid this dude who seem to have an agenda to derail the issue of the thread so we can actually see mayweather and pac fight

LONG LIVE BOXING

[Chuckguy]

Im glad to hear Freddie say that. I say come to the table with 17 days. make the fight happen. If and only if Floyd gets the nod on saturday

[Doctor_Tenma]

so if pac just said no without offering any explanation you would've been fine with that?

He would have been much better off

[swizz]

no cut off dates

[IMDAZED]

so if pac just said no without offering any explanation you would've been fine with that?

I would've wondered why.

[swizz]

maybe floyd shouldnt have asked for it

your ******,if the fighters want to have a cut-off date that's fine why? because there's already an UNLIMITED URINALYSIS CLAUSE whereby they can test all PEDS except for HGH the gasser of athletes and we all know PAC does not gas, so why the b
and they ha

you and i both know,that pac has stated in 2005 the blood test he took 3 days b4 the morales fighter contributed to the overall result whereby he hrad an allout war with morales for 12 rounds and when he didnt take a blood test 7 months later, he pummelled him
you lie through your gritty teef knowing pac has a legitimated valid reason to ask for a cut-off date which has been out for 2 months now and try to make the issue about cut-off date now when everyone including floyd moved on from the idea of random testing itself... that's last years news *****


JQ is right about you man, youre not worth debating

the rest of your statements below are used to support your premise above and i answered it and destroyed it.. i dont need to seriously reply to it...




*****


on a side-note lets all get back to topic people and avoid this dude who seem to have an agenda to derail the issue of the thread so we can actually see mayweather and pac fight

LONG LIVE BOXING

by the way urine does not detect epo

[switchsouthpaw]

I've read. And knowing when two of three blood tests will be taken while asking for a cutoff for the third is not random. You've got to be a real idiot to think that. Think...think...think.

You just said in your last post, that all of the tests were urine and not blood, now you're stipulating that I'm correct about the blood tests, but now you want to change the argument to the number of times Pac is given the test.

You are really grasping at straws to find any argument you can in favor of Mayweather, even if it means contradicting your own posts, before you respond would you like me to quote your own post on the last page, where you said Pac agreed "only" to urine tests and not blood tests?, but now you're stipulating that he is willing to take blood tests.....

[brick wall]

He would have been much better off

and there would've been no constant bitching from floyd fans for pac to take the test?

[IMDAZED]

Who else was Mayweather going to fight...Matthew Hatton? C'mon give me some names??? The guy would have been roasted if he didn't take on a viable threat, and this is his first real test at 147, and he joined the division in 2005, you don't believe me then defer to Manny Steward,Larry Merchant, Dougie Fischer and Dan Rafael of ESPN, as they're all in agreement with respect to that same opinion.

And then you ask who cares? Anyone who loves the sport of boxing and not just individual fighters. I am pretty sure they all care.

Anyone who loves the sport of boxing should have no issues with a fighter who wants to protect himself by having real tests taken.

[IMDAZED]

First, what I listed are the last conditions right before the fight was called off. No need to bring up initial stipulations when those have been renegotiated.

Second, don't reply to a post you didn't read... it only adds to the confusion.

You are telling me NOTHING.