Comments Thread For: Mayweather-Pacquiao: Roach Has a Drug Testing Solution

[Doctor_Tenma]

you and i both know,that pac has stated in 2005 the blood test he took 3 days b4 the morales fighter contributed to the overall result whereby he hrad an allout war with morales for 12 rounds and when he didnt take a blood test 7 months later, he pummelled him
you lie through your gritty teef knowing pac has a legitimated valid reason to ask for a cut-off date which has been out for 2 months now and try to make the issue about cut-off date now when everyone including floyd moved on from the idea of random testing itself... that's last years news *****

Man...

English please.

Also, he took a blood test the day before facing Erik Morales. What does that have to do with anything, if he's being given a 14 day cutoff?

[brick wall]

I would've wondered why.

so for you the only solution is for pac to take the test right? because he is a threat...

[V.WEBB]

you and i both know,that pac has stated in 2005 the blood test he took 3 days b4 the morales fighter contributed to the overall result whereby he hrad an allout war with morales for 12 rounds and when he didnt take a blood test 7 months later, he pummelled him

No credit to Morales in that fight huh?

[IMDAZED]

maybe floyd shouldnt have asked for it

your ******,if the fighters want to have a cut-off date that's fine why? because there's already an UNLIMITED URINALYSIS CLAUSE whereby they can test all PEDS except for HGH the gasser of athletes and we all know PAC does not gas, so why the b
and they ha

you and i both know,that pac has stated in 2005 the blood test he took 3 days b4 the morales fighter contributed to the overall result whereby he hrad an allout war with morales for 12 rounds and when he didnt take a blood test 7 months later, he pummelled him
you lie through your gritty teef knowing pac has a legitimated valid reason to ask for a cut-off date which has been out for 2 months now and try to make the issue about cut-off date now when everyone including floyd moved on from the idea of random testing itself... that's last years news *****


JQ is right about you man, youre not worth debating

the rest of your statements below are used to support your premise above and i answered it and destroyed it.. i dont need to seriously reply to it...




*****


on a side-note lets all get back to topic people and avoid this dude who seem to have an agenda to derail the issue of the thread so we can actually see mayweather and pac fight

LONG LIVE BOXING

You can't expect me to take you serious. Take your own advice and go write novels to someone else.

[Vasyl’s dad]

That is called leverage.

Leverage is used to make a fight happen.

Excuses are used to make them not happen.

Floyd has ruined many a great matchup these last 5 years.

I'd hardly call that "leverage".

The guy called it perfectly as an exit strategy.

[IMDAZED]

so for you the only solution is for pac to take the test right? because he is a threat...

Solution to what? Let's talk reality. The reality is that Pacquiao lies, twisted facts and contradicted himself. That alone makes him su****ious.

[Doctor_Tenma]

and there would've been no constant bitching from floyd fans for pac to take the test?

I would have been skeptical; as I have always been of Pacquiao and keep things to myself.

[Vasyl’s dad]

so if pac just said no without offering any explanation you would've been fine with that?

No matter what Pac would have done,

had he said something or not,

many would think he was hiding something. Its their crutch.

But ask them for threads about PEDs and OSTs before last year,

*crickets*

[V.WEBB]

Leverage is used to make a fight happen.

Excuses are used to make them not happen.

Floyd has ruined many a great matchup these last 5 years.

I'd hardly call that "leverage".

The guy called it perfectly as an exit strategy.

An exit strategy so much so that he is fighting Shane in 2 days?

Gotcha TortillaMayweather Sr.

[IMDAZED]

You just said in your last post, that all of the tests were urine and not blood, now you're stipulating that I'm correct about the blood tests, but now you want to change the argument to the number of times Pac is given the test.

You are really grasping at straws to find any argument you can in favor of Mayweather, even if it means contradicting your own posts, before you respond would you like me to quote your own post on the last page, where you said Pac agreed "only" to urine tests and not blood tests?

I didn't state you were correct about tests. You are reading what you want to.

They have never agreed to random blood tests. If they had, we wouldn't be even having this conversation, would we? Maybe the word random is throwing you off.