Better Resume, Shane or Floyd?

[BoxerDood]

Obviously Shane. It almost look like you made this thread to see who would be ****** enough to say otherwise, because nobody in their right mind would.

Floyd's two year layoff and weak 2006 screwed up his resume. If he hadn't retired he might have passed him.

[Walt Liquor]

shane by far. one must look at the time n the opponents career at theirweight class. shane has fought waaaaay better fighters and that's not even close, AND shane has better wins.

[Chups]

Close....but I think Mosley gets the nod.

[Ch@mpBox@PR]

I disagree. He lost to Oscar the 2nd time despite juicing.

Floyd absolutely dominated an undefeated Corrales. He fought a razor thin fight with Castillo(I scored it a draw), immediately rematched him and beat him clear as day.

Undefeated Hatton is a solid win. Oscar at 154 is an underrated win for Floyd IMO.

The Marquez win gets nothing from me.

But Mosley has gotten dominated.....I factor that in to resumes. Some of his losses have been one sided.

What Happend the first time though? And Floyd lost to Castillo the first time, if you want to go there.

The bold I like. I want to know those kind of things!!

[mandirigma]

Shane. . . .

[-GDS-]

Since losses don't count and all, could I fight the Klit. bros, David Haye and Chad Dawson and have a better resume than both these guys?

[boxasmash]

PRIME ODLH and Margarito>>>>>Mayweather's resume. / thread.

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

So wait by this logic Judah has a better resume then Floyd?

[dans]

For resume I take who they foughy overall. Then I take into account W's and L's and how they won or loss.

Floyd also has titles in 5 weight divisions and is notorious for shutting out opponents. So there's your dominance.

If you take into account HOW they're winning, that can't be denied.

[Ch@mpBox@PR]

So wait by this logic Judah has a better resume then Floyd?

By What Logic???????