I mean Oscar x2 and Margarito are better wins than anything on Floyd's resume
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Better Resume, Shane or Floyd?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by dans01234 View PostChamp I think we may have argued this type thing before.
I think you consider resume "who they've faced", correct? Not who they've beaten or lost to?
Comment
-
Let me ask this, are you guys basing the "resume" on who they fought or who they beat because to be honest with you anyone can fight top fighters and lose. Yes it shows some heart to fight the best but if you your'e losing these fights then whats the sense.
Comment
-
I think Shane first win over Oscar is better than any win in Floyd career.
However, overall from top to bottom I like Floyd resume better...
Comment
-
This is so laughable.Shane Mosley by more then a mile!Mayweather is such a fraud.He didnt get in the ring with the likes of Vernon Forrest, Winky Wright.He didnt fight De La Hoya in his prime.I am sick of all these Mayweather fans making excuses for this guy who handpicks his opponents!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ch@mpBox@PR View PostI mean Oscar x2 and Margarito are better wins than anything on Floyd's resume
Floyd absolutely dominated an undefeated Corrales. He fought a razor thin fight with Castillo(I scored it a draw), immediately rematched him and beat him clear as day.
Undefeated Hatton is a solid win. Oscar at 154 is an underrated win for Floyd IMO.
The Marquez win gets nothing from me.
But Mosley has gotten dominated.....I factor that in to resumes. Some of his losses have been one sided.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jrosales13 View PostI think Shane first win over Oscar is better than any win in Floyd career.
However, overall from top to bottom I like Floyd resume better...
Comment
Comment